Characteristics of electrometers on ionization chamber dosimetry in ultra-high dose-rate proton beam irradiation

Purpose This study investigated the influence of differences in electrometers on the dosimetry of UHDR scanning proton beam irradiation. Method A measurement system that combined ionization measurements using an ionization chamber and electrometers with luminescence observations of an intensifying screen was used. Proton beams were delivered to this system at various doses and dose rates, and dose-to-luminescence ratios were calculated. Performance was compared among three different electrometers: RAMTEC DUO (RAMTEC), Sakura Proof (Sakura), which are charge accumulation-type, and UNIDOS webline (UNIDOS), which is current integration-type. Results The differences between the maximum and minimum dose-to-luminescence values were 0.851 % (4 Gy) and 1.543 % (20 Gy) for the RAMTEC, 0.913 % (4 Gy) and 1.626 % (20 Gy) for the Sakura, and 1.885 % (4 Gy) and 1.672 % (20 Gy) for the UNIDOS. A comparison of the variances showed that the UNIDOS exhibited significantly larger variances at 20.0, 50.0, and 100.0 Gy/s for 4 Gy and at 124.0 and 167.0 Gy/s for 20 Gy. Regarding dose rate correlations, at 4 Gy, RAMTEC and Sakura showed a positive correlation at dose rates of 10 Gy/s or less. At 20 Gy, no difference was observed among the three electrometers for dose rates up to 50 Gy/s. However, only the UNIDOS showed a negative correlation at dose rates of 100 Gy/s or higher. Conclusion Our findings suggest that current integration-type electrometers perform better with conventional dose rates, whereas charge accumulation-type electrometers allow for more stable measurements in UHDR environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica Medica
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2026.107221
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Characteristics of electrometers on ionization chamber dosimetry in ultra-high dose-rate proton beam irradiation

Teiji Nishio, Ryosaku Yamada
Physica Medica
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Characteristics of electrometers on ionization chamber dosimetry in ultra-high dose-rate proton beam irradiation

Teiji Nishio, Ryosaku Yamada
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the influence of differences in electrometers on the dosimetry of UHDR scanning proton beam irradiation. Method A measurement system that combined ionization measurements using an ionization chamber and electrometers with luminescence observations of an intensifying screen was used. Proton beams were delivered to this system at various doses and dose rates, and dose-to-luminescence ratios were calculated. Performance was compared among three different electrometers: RAMTEC DUO (RAMTEC), Sakura Proof (Sakura), which are charge accumulation-type, and UNIDOS webline (UNIDOS), which is current integration-type. Results The differences between the maximum and minimum dose-to-luminescence values were 0.851 % (4 Gy) and 1.543 % (20 Gy) for the RAMTEC, 0.913 % (4 Gy) and 1.626 % (20 Gy) for the Sakura, and 1.885 % (4 Gy) and 1.672 % (20 Gy) for the UNIDOS. A comparison of the variances showed that the UNIDOS exhibited significantly larger variances at 20.0, 50.0, and 100.0 Gy/s for 4 Gy and at 124.0 and 167.0 Gy/s for 20 Gy. Regarding dose rate correlations, at 4 Gy, RAMTEC and Sakura showed a positive correlation at dose rates of 10 Gy/s or less. At 20 Gy, no difference was observed among the three electrometers for dose rates up to 50 Gy/s. However, only the UNIDOS showed a negative correlation at dose rates of 100 Gy/s or higher. Conclusion Our findings suggest that current integration-type electrometers perform better with conventional dose rates, whereas charge accumulation-type electrometers allow for more stable measurements in UHDR environments.

Physica MedicaVol. 152
The University of Osaka (JP)
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon