Why Would Others Help Me?: How People Explain Why They Can (or Cannot) Rely on Family and Friends

Most people count on family and friends to assist them in times of need; this study asks why people think that they can count on them. We coded about 1,100 respondents’ open-ended explanations for why they could—or could not—rely on relatives and friends in a crisis, yielding about a dozen main themes. Respondents largely explained that relatives would help because of affection, secondarily because of relatives’ past support or norms of obligation. The small minority who doubted relatives’ help said that they had no kin ties, pointed to practical impediments, or claimed no need for relatives’ help. Respondents explained friends’ help in similar ways. Three master themes emerged: sentiment, exchange history, and practical impediments. Younger respondents emphasized sentiment to explain family help, women more often cited past exchanges, and the better-educated stressed exchange history with relatives but sentiment with friends. The heavy emphasis on personal affection departs from main accounts in the social support literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology Quarterly
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725261499717
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Why Would Others Help Me?: How People Explain Why They Can (or Cannot) Rely on Family and Friends

Claude S. Fischer, Chris Soria
Social Psychology Quarterly
Social Capital and Networks
article

Why Would Others Help Me?: How People Explain Why They Can (or Cannot) Rely on Family and Friends

Claude S. Fischer, Chris Soria
article en

Abstract

Most people count on family and friends to assist them in times of need; this study asks why people think that they can count on them. We coded about 1,100 respondents’ open-ended explanations for why they could—or could not—rely on relatives and friends in a crisis, yielding about a dozen main themes. Respondents largely explained that relatives would help because of affection, secondarily because of relatives’ past support or norms of obligation. The small minority who doubted relatives’ help said that they had no kin ties, pointed to practical impediments, or claimed no need for relatives’ help. Respondents explained friends’ help in similar ways. Three master themes emerged: sentiment, exchange history, and practical impediments. Younger respondents emphasized sentiment to explain family help, women more often cited past exchanges, and the better-educated stressed exchange history with relatives but sentiment with friends. The heavy emphasis on personal affection departs from main accounts in the social support literature.

Social Psychology Quarterly
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon