A Network Analysis of Attitudes Toward People Who Stutter From the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering Database

PURPOSE: Network analysis was used to examine the beliefs about and behaviors toward people who stutter using data from the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) Database. METHOD: Data from 5,044 people in the United States who were native English speakers, did not stutter, and who completed every question on the Stuttering section of the POSHA-S were used to create a network. Nodes in the network represented the 39 items on the POSHA-S, and edges connected nodes based on the direction and strength of the correlation in the response of two items/nodes. RESULTS: Node strength was used to identify five nodes that could be targeted in future interventions. A community detection analysis revealed five communities (i.e., subsets of nodes that tended to cling together) instead of the eight components and two subscales of the POSHA-S. Each community contained at least one belief and several self-reactions, with the various components of the POSHA-S tending to concentrate in a given community. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the component/subscale structure of the POSHA-S and the observed communities may reflect the difference between how experts view a phenomenon and how everyday people view the same phenomenon. The observed community structure and nodes high in strength have several implications for those designing a public education campaign to reduce the stigma toward people who stutter. Several other ways that network analysis can be used to inform efforts to reduce the stigma toward people who stutter are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-26-00454
Primary Topic
Stuttering Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Network Analysis of Attitudes Toward People Who Stutter From the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering Database

Michael S. Vitevitch, Madison P. Jewitt
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Stuttering Research and Treatment
article

A Network Analysis of Attitudes Toward People Who Stutter From the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes–Stuttering Database

Michael S. Vitevitch, Madison P. Jewitt
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Network analysis was used to examine the beliefs about and behaviors toward people who stutter using data from the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) Database. METHOD: Data from 5,044 people in the United States who were native English speakers, did not stutter, and who completed every question on the Stuttering section of the POSHA-S were used to create a network. Nodes in the network represented the 39 items on the POSHA-S, and edges connected nodes based on the direction and strength of the correlation in the response of two items/nodes. RESULTS: Node strength was used to identify five nodes that could be targeted in future interventions. A community detection analysis revealed five communities (i.e., subsets of nodes that tended to cling together) instead of the eight components and two subscales of the POSHA-S. Each community contained at least one belief and several self-reactions, with the various components of the POSHA-S tending to concentrate in a given community. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the component/subscale structure of the POSHA-S and the observed communities may reflect the difference between how experts view a phenomenon and how everyday people view the same phenomenon. The observed community structure and nodes high in strength have several implications for those designing a public education campaign to reduce the stigma toward people who stutter. Several other ways that network analysis can be used to inform efforts to reduce the stigma toward people who stutter are also discussed.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
University of Kansas (US)
Stuttering Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon