The Principle of Social Justice in the Practice of the Constitutional Courts of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Part 2

This article, continuing the first phase of the study, addresses issues of appealing to the principles of fairness and social justice, the use of the principle of social justice as a «figure of speech», and other issues. It concludes that the concept of fairness in constitutional court decisions often takes on social connotations in the context of individual cases. Attention is paid to the role of the principle of social justice in the reasoning of constitutional courts and to a discussion of the universal characteristics of this principle in practice. Key priorities and guidelines that constitutional courts strive to follow in their decision-making are also identified. It is proposed to use the existing positive experience of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Belarus to improve the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and further develop legal regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of constitutional justice
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4144-2026-4-40-46
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Principle of Social Justice in the Practice of the Constitutional Courts of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Part 2

Maria A. Pavlova
Journal of constitutional justice
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

The Principle of Social Justice in the Practice of the Constitutional Courts of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Part 2

Maria A. Pavlova
article en

Abstract

This article, continuing the first phase of the study, addresses issues of appealing to the principles of fairness and social justice, the use of the principle of social justice as a «figure of speech», and other issues. It concludes that the concept of fairness in constitutional court decisions often takes on social connotations in the context of individual cases. Attention is paid to the role of the principle of social justice in the reasoning of constitutional courts and to a discussion of the universal characteristics of this principle in practice. Key priorities and guidelines that constitutional courts strive to follow in their decision-making are also identified. It is proposed to use the existing positive experience of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Belarus to improve the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and further develop legal regulation.

Journal of constitutional justice
Ural State Law University (RU)
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon