Heightened bilateral foot coupling in older adults under cognitive load: beyond sway variability and complexity

Postural control under cognitive load is a sensitive marker of aging, yet most dual-task posturography studies analyze the global center of pressure as a single time series, overlooking how the two feet coordinate. Whether the predicted loss of adaptive complexity manifests in individual-limb dynamics or in bilateral coupling remains unclear. Forty-four community-dwelling adults (22 young, mean age 23.27 ± 1.93 years, 12 male; 22 older, mean age 73.05 ± 4.28 years, 7 male) completed standing single-task and two dual-task conditions (visual and auditory n-back) on dual force plates. Linear measures were low-pass filtered, whereas nonlinear measures (multiscale entropy, detrended fluctuation analysis, multifractal DFA, recurrence quantification, and Higuchi fractal dimension) were computed unfiltered because low-pass filtering can distort these measures. Univariate nonlinear analyses revealed widespread anteroposterior Group main effects (DFA, multifractal DFA, recurrence quantification, and Higuchi fractal dimension; F = 6–43, p ≤ 0.018) that were detected in the unfiltered pipeline but not under conventional low-pass filtering, although dual-task-specific Group × Condition interactions were smaller and consistently mediolateral (largest partial η 2 = 0.095). Bilateral anteroposterior coherence revealed a robust Group × Condition interaction ( F (1.83, 73.28) = 9.703, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.195). Older adults exhibited high baseline bilateral anteroposterior synchronization (0.750) that decreased under dual-task (0.716–0.738), whereas young adults showed low baseline synchronization (0.474) that remained stable or slightly increased (0.520–0.534). Additional coupling measures showed significant Group main effects (cross-sample entropy in both directions and mediolateral multiscale cross-entropy, all p < 0.01). In exploratory, FDR-uncorrected analyses, the mediolateral multifractal DTC–cognition correlation present under filtering ( r = −0.41) attenuated in the unfiltered pipeline ( r = −0.26), whereas an anteroposterior association emerged ( r = −0.37) and requires confirmation. These findings suggest that older-group nonlinear differences are concentrated in the anteroposterior direction as Group main effects and were not detected under conventional filtering, whereas the dual-task-specific signature manifests in bilateral foot coordination rather than individual complexity. Bilateral coupling measures, computed with unfiltered nonlinear processing, are positioned as a candidate tool for assessing cognitive-motor integrity in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2026.1979600
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Heightened bilateral foot coupling in older adults under cognitive load: beyond sway variability and complexity

Gayeong Hyeon, Sunghoon Shin
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Heightened bilateral foot coupling in older adults under cognitive load: beyond sway variability and complexity

Gayeong Hyeon, Sunghoon Shin
article en

Abstract

Postural control under cognitive load is a sensitive marker of aging, yet most dual-task posturography studies analyze the global center of pressure as a single time series, overlooking how the two feet coordinate. Whether the predicted loss of adaptive complexity manifests in individual-limb dynamics or in bilateral coupling remains unclear. Forty-four community-dwelling adults (22 young, mean age 23.27 ± 1.93 years, 12 male; 22 older, mean age 73.05 ± 4.28 years, 7 male) completed standing single-task and two dual-task conditions (visual and auditory n-back) on dual force plates. Linear measures were low-pass filtered, whereas nonlinear measures (multiscale entropy, detrended fluctuation analysis, multifractal DFA, recurrence quantification, and Higuchi fractal dimension) were computed unfiltered because low-pass filtering can distort these measures. Univariate nonlinear analyses revealed widespread anteroposterior Group main effects (DFA, multifractal DFA, recurrence quantification, and Higuchi fractal dimension; F = 6–43, p ≤ 0.018) that were detected in the unfiltered pipeline but not under conventional low-pass filtering, although dual-task-specific Group × Condition interactions were smaller and consistently mediolateral (largest partial η 2 = 0.095). Bilateral anteroposterior coherence revealed a robust Group × Condition interaction ( F (1.83, 73.28) = 9.703, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.195). Older adults exhibited high baseline bilateral anteroposterior synchronization (0.750) that decreased under dual-task (0.716–0.738), whereas young adults showed low baseline synchronization (0.474) that remained stable or slightly increased (0.520–0.534). Additional coupling measures showed significant Group main effects (cross-sample entropy in both directions and mediolateral multiscale cross-entropy, all p < 0.01). In exploratory, FDR-uncorrected analyses, the mediolateral multifractal DTC–cognition correlation present under filtering ( r = −0.41) attenuated in the unfiltered pipeline ( r = −0.26), whereas an anteroposterior association emerged ( r = −0.37) and requires confirmation. These findings suggest that older-group nonlinear differences are concentrated in the anteroposterior direction as Group main effects and were not detected under conventional filtering, whereas the dual-task-specific signature manifests in bilateral foot coordination rather than individual complexity. Bilateral coupling measures, computed with unfiltered nonlinear processing, are positioned as a candidate tool for assessing cognitive-motor integrity in older adults.

Frontiers in Aging NeuroscienceVol. 18
Yeungnam University (KR)
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon