Remote Sensing and Ensemble Machine Learning for Illegal Dumpsite Susceptibility Mapping: A Review

Purpose: This review asks whether, and under what conditions, combining satellite remote sensing with machine learning, and ensemble learning in particular, improves the mapping of illegal-dumpsite susceptibility, and where the evidence for that claim is still missing, with emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria. Methodology: A structured narrative review with a non-systematic, purposive selection of studies was carried out. Candidate studies published from 2000 to 2026 were identified through targeted keyword searches of scholarly databases and search engines (Google Scholar, Scopus-indexed journals and African Journals Online), combining dumping terms (illegal dump, illegal landfill, dumpsite) with remote-sensing, susceptibility and machine-learning terms, and through citation chasing from recent surveys. Empirical studies that detected dumpsites or mapped dumping susceptibility with remote-sensing or GIS predictors and reported a validation outcome were included, and each was appraised for source type and validation design. Twenty-one empirical studies (16 international detection and susceptibility studies and 5 Nigerian studies) were synthesised, supported by methodological literature. Findings: Susceptibility studies outside Africa report strong discrimination with comparatively simple models (logistic regression, overall accuracy 92–94%; discriminant analysis, AUC 0.97–0.98), and the largest head-to-head comparison (seven classifiers on the same data) found AUC values within a narrow range (0.86–0.89). The two African susceptibility studies (Dakar, Blantyre) used expert-weighted multicriteria analysis rather than machine learning. Only one study used spatial cross-validation, none used a stacking ensemble, and no Nigerian study has modelled susceptibility predictively. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: Unlike recent surveys that focus on detecting waste in imagery, this review compares susceptibility-mapping methods on their reported performance and validation practice, maps the regional evidence gap for Nigeria, and sets out minimum standards (simple-model baselines, spatial validation and treatment of pseudo-absences) that future ensemble studies must meet before ensembles can be recommended to waste-management authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environment
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47941/je.4089
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Remote Sensing and Ensemble Machine Learning for Illegal Dumpsite Susceptibility Mapping: A Review

Victor Ayodele Ijaware, S.O. Ogunlade, Joshua Ojotule Salifu
1 links
Journal of Environment
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Remote Sensing and Ensemble Machine Learning for Illegal Dumpsite Susceptibility Mapping: A Review

Victor Ayodele Ijaware, S.O. Ogunlade, Joshua Ojotule Salifu
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This review asks whether, and under what conditions, combining satellite remote sensing with machine learning, and ensemble learning in particular, improves the mapping of illegal-dumpsite susceptibility, and where the evidence for that claim is still missing, with emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria. Methodology: A structured narrative review with a non-systematic, purposive selection of studies was carried out. Candidate studies published from 2000 to 2026 were identified through targeted keyword searches of scholarly databases and search engines (Google Scholar, Scopus-indexed journals and African Journals Online), combining dumping terms (illegal dump, illegal landfill, dumpsite) with remote-sensing, susceptibility and machine-learning terms, and through citation chasing from recent surveys. Empirical studies that detected dumpsites or mapped dumping susceptibility with remote-sensing or GIS predictors and reported a validation outcome were included, and each was appraised for source type and validation design. Twenty-one empirical studies (16 international detection and susceptibility studies and 5 Nigerian studies) were synthesised, supported by methodological literature. Findings: Susceptibility studies outside Africa report strong discrimination with comparatively simple models (logistic regression, overall accuracy 92–94%; discriminant analysis, AUC 0.97–0.98), and the largest head-to-head comparison (seven classifiers on the same data) found AUC values within a narrow range (0.86–0.89). The two African susceptibility studies (Dakar, Blantyre) used expert-weighted multicriteria analysis rather than machine learning. Only one study used spatial cross-validation, none used a stacking ensemble, and no Nigerian study has modelled susceptibility predictively. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: Unlike recent surveys that focus on detecting waste in imagery, this review compares susceptibility-mapping methods on their reported performance and validation practice, maps the regional evidence gap for Nigeria, and sets out minimum standards (simple-model baselines, spatial validation and treatment of pseudo-absences) that future ensemble studies must meet before ensembles can be recommended to waste-management authorities.

Journal of EnvironmentVol. 6(4)
Federal University of Technology (NG)
Life on land
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon