A Review of Virtual Power Plants and Adjacent Research from a Decision-Focused Learning Perspective

Virtual power plant (VPP) operation commonly follows a predict-then-optimize framework, in which forecasts of generation, demand, and prices feed downstream optimization. However, minimizing statistical forecast errors overlooks cost asymmetry across error directions and periods, and the nonlinear response of decisions. This has motivated decision-focused learning, which incorporates downstream cost, profit, and risk into training or uncertainty representation. This paper reviews VPP and adjacent studies from three perspectives. Market participation benefits from identifying profit-sensitive periods and variables; resource operation requires attention to physical and time-coupled constraints and operational feasibility; and uncertainty handling improves when forecasts are aligned with downstream outcomes. Forecasts should therefore be evaluated using statistical metrics together with economic, operational, and risk implications. We further identify when such approaches are advantageous.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5370/kiee.2026.75.11.2850
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Review of Virtual Power Plants and Adjacent Research from a Decision-Focused Learning Perspective

Seong-Hyeok Ko, Dae-Jin Kim, Yun-Su Kim
2 links
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Smart Grid Energy Management
article

A Review of Virtual Power Plants and Adjacent Research from a Decision-Focused Learning Perspective

Seong-Hyeok Ko, Dae-Jin Kim, Yun-Su Kim
article en

Abstract

Virtual power plant (VPP) operation commonly follows a predict-then-optimize framework, in which forecasts of generation, demand, and prices feed downstream optimization. However, minimizing statistical forecast errors overlooks cost asymmetry across error directions and periods, and the nonlinear response of decisions. This has motivated decision-focused learning, which incorporates downstream cost, profit, and risk into training or uncertainty representation. This paper reviews VPP and adjacent studies from three perspectives. Market participation benefits from identifying profit-sensitive periods and variables; resource operation requires attention to physical and time-coupled constraints and operational feasibility; and uncertainty handling improves when forecasts are aligned with downstream outcomes. Forecasts should therefore be evaluated using statistical metrics together with economic, operational, and risk implications. We further identify when such approaches are advantageous.

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical EngineersVol. 75(11)
Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Smart Grid Energy Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
A Review of Virtual Power Plants and Adjacent Research from a Decision-Focused Learning Perspective — Seong-Hyeok Ko, Dae-Jin Kim, et al. · The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS