A counterexample to a conjecture of Cerf on second-order pivots

For an increasing subset $A$ of $\{0,1\}^n$, Cerf considers the number $\phi_2(A)$ of pairs $(\omega,i)$ with $\omega\in A$ and $i$ a positive pivot of order at most two at $\omega$, and the analogous count $\phi_{2\setminus1}(A)$ of pivots of order exactly two. He conjectured that every maximizer of either functional contains all configurations with at least $n/2+1$ ones and no configuration with fewer than $n/2-2$ ones, which would give $\phi_2(A)\le 6\sqrt n\,2^n$. We show that the conjecture fails. For $n=10^{14}$, and more generally for every $n=h^2$ with $10\mid h$ and $h>2{,}592{,}000$, there is an increasing set with $\phi_{2\setminus1}(A)\ge 2^n n/259200$, while every increasing set inside the conjectured band has $\phi_2(A)\le 10\sqrt n\,2^n$. Consequently no maximizer of either functional lies in the band. The set is a random monotone CNF of the kind used by Talagrand, and the proof is a first and second moment count over the clauses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24063831
Primary Topic
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

A counterexample to a conjecture of Cerf on second-order pivots

Yitzchak Shmalo
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
preprint

A counterexample to a conjecture of Cerf on second-order pivots

Yitzchak Shmalo
preprint en

Abstract

For an increasing subset $A$ of $\{0,1\}^n$, Cerf considers the number $\phi_2(A)$ of pairs $(\omega,i)$ with $\omega\in A$ and $i$ a positive pivot of order at most two at $\omega$, and the analogous count $\phi_{2\setminus1}(A)$ of pivots of order exactly two. He conjectured that every maximizer of either functional contains all configurations with at least $n/2+1$ ones and no configuration with fewer than $n/2-2$ ones, which would give $\phi_2(A)\le 6\sqrt n\,2^n$. We show that the conjecture fails. For $n=10^{14}$, and more generally for every $n=h^2$ with $10\mid h$ and $h>2{,}592{,}000$, there is an increasing set with $\phi_{2\setminus1}(A)\ge 2^n n/259200$, while every increasing set inside the conjectured band has $\phi_2(A)\le 10\sqrt n\,2^n$. Consequently no maximizer of either functional lies in the band. The set is a random monotone CNF of the kind used by Talagrand, and the proof is a first and second moment count over the clauses.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon