Toward Racially Affirming Care for Black Children, Families, and Communities

This review examines Beverly-Jean M. Daniel’s We Were Not Built to Break: Racially Affirming Care for Black Children, Families, and Communities as a significant contribution to childhood studies and child-facing professions. The review considers how Daniel conceptualizes care as a racialized, relational, and institutionally situated practice rather than an assumed good. It traces the book’s attention towards anti-Black racism, child welfare, schooling, assessment, mental health, racial trauma, and positive Black racial identity socialization and considers these themes within an Australian context. The review reflects on how Daniel’s work provokes critical questions about race, colonialism, place, institutional power, and historically accountable forms of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Childhood Studies
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs515202622951
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Toward Racially Affirming Care for Black Children, Families, and Communities

Karen Nociti, Lauren Brophy
Journal of Childhood Studies
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Toward Racially Affirming Care for Black Children, Families, and Communities

Karen Nociti, Lauren Brophy
article en

Abstract

This review examines Beverly-Jean M. Daniel’s We Were Not Built to Break: Racially Affirming Care for Black Children, Families, and Communities as a significant contribution to childhood studies and child-facing professions. The review considers how Daniel conceptualizes care as a racialized, relational, and institutionally situated practice rather than an assumed good. It traces the book’s attention towards anti-Black racism, child welfare, schooling, assessment, mental health, racial trauma, and positive Black racial identity socialization and considers these themes within an Australian context. The review reflects on how Daniel’s work provokes critical questions about race, colonialism, place, institutional power, and historically accountable forms of care.

Journal of Childhood Studies
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon