Education researchers’ concerns on data and material sharing: A latent class analysis

Special Education and Education researchers tend to support data and material sharing in principle, but actual rates of sharing remain low (e.g., Logan et al., 2025; Cook et al., 2023). The current study used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct groups of education researchers based on their concerns related to sharing data and study materials. We analyzed survey responses from 1,383 education researchers across four sub-samples: those who did and did not share data, and those who did and did not share materials in their most recent scholarly work. Among the respondents who did not share data (Data Non-Sharers; DNS), we found four classes (Unconvinced DNS, Unconcerned DNS, Protective and Possessive DNS, and Overwhelmed DNS). For the respondents who did not share materials (Material Non-Sharers; MNS), we found three classes (Unconcerned MNS, Logistically/Ethically Concerned MNS, and Unconvinced MNS). Class membership was associated with sharing attitudes, behaviors, and future intentions to share. Taken together, these findings suggest that barriers and concerns related to sharing cluster into distinct patterns, which may call for tailored supports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/gva2t_v1
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Education researchers’ concerns on data and material sharing: A latent class analysis

Sara Ann Hart, Brielle E. Babcock, Sean Patrick McCarron, Jeffrey A. Shero et al.
3 links
EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Research Data Management Practices
preprint

Education researchers’ concerns on data and material sharing: A latent class analysis

Sara Ann Hart, Brielle E. Babcock, Sean Patrick McCarron, Jeffrey A. Shero, Jessica A. R. Logan, Allyson L. Hanson, Stephanie Estrera, Christine M. White, Alexis Swanz
preprint en

Abstract

Special Education and Education researchers tend to support data and material sharing in principle, but actual rates of sharing remain low (e.g., Logan et al., 2025; Cook et al., 2023). The current study used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct groups of education researchers based on their concerns related to sharing data and study materials. We analyzed survey responses from 1,383 education researchers across four sub-samples: those who did and did not share data, and those who did and did not share materials in their most recent scholarly work. Among the respondents who did not share data (Data Non-Sharers; DNS), we found four classes (Unconvinced DNS, Unconcerned DNS, Protective and Possessive DNS, and Overwhelmed DNS). For the respondents who did not share materials (Material Non-Sharers; MNS), we found three classes (Unconcerned MNS, Logistically/Ethically Concerned MNS, and Unconvinced MNS). Class membership was associated with sharing attitudes, behaviors, and future intentions to share. Taken together, these findings suggest that barriers and concerns related to sharing cluster into distinct patterns, which may call for tailored supports.

EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Florida State University (US), University of Oxford (GB)
Quality education
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon