Task-Specific Arc-Flash Incident-Energy Analysis and Protection Criteria Using Field Incident Data and PSCAD in the Electric Power Industry

This study develops task-specific arc-flash incident-energy analysis and protection criteria using 41 accidents in power facilities from 2018 to 2023. Each case was reconstructed in PSCAD/EMTDC with system impedance, fault type, working distance, equipment geometry, and protective-device characteristics. Incident energy was calculated using IEEE Std 1584-2018 and a high-voltage arc model. The results ranged from 1.37 to 127.1 J/cm² for 14 low-voltage cases and from 12.7 to 613.6 J/cm² for 27 high-voltage cases. Low-voltage metering work was dominated by delayed upstream-fuse clearing, whereas high-voltage transformer, switchgear, VLF, and MOF tasks were affected by long clearing times or short working distances. Only the NFPA 70E incidentenergy analysis method was used for PPE selection; the PPE category table method was not applied. PPE arc ratings must equal or exceed residual incident energy after engineering controls, and de-energized work is prioritized when inputs are uncertain or residual energy exceeds the available protection system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5370/kiee.2026.75.11.3014
Primary Topic
Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Task-Specific Arc-Flash Incident-Energy Analysis and Protection Criteria Using Field Incident Data and PSCAD in the Electric Power Industry

Daesik Lim, Dongyeop Lee, Kihyun Kim
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
article

Task-Specific Arc-Flash Incident-Energy Analysis and Protection Criteria Using Field Incident Data and PSCAD in the Electric Power Industry

Daesik Lim, Dongyeop Lee, Kihyun Kim
article en

Abstract

This study develops task-specific arc-flash incident-energy analysis and protection criteria using 41 accidents in power facilities from 2018 to 2023. Each case was reconstructed in PSCAD/EMTDC with system impedance, fault type, working distance, equipment geometry, and protective-device characteristics. Incident energy was calculated using IEEE Std 1584-2018 and a high-voltage arc model. The results ranged from 1.37 to 127.1 J/cm² for 14 low-voltage cases and from 12.7 to 613.6 J/cm² for 27 high-voltage cases. Low-voltage metering work was dominated by delayed upstream-fuse clearing, whereas high-voltage transformer, switchgear, VLF, and MOF tasks were affected by long clearing times or short working distances. Only the NFPA 70E incidentenergy analysis method was used for PPE selection; the PPE category table method was not applied. PPE arc ratings must equal or exceed residual incident energy after engineering controls, and de-energized work is prioritized when inputs are uncertain or residual energy exceeds the available protection system.

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical EngineersVol. 75(11)
Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon