Learning to Teach Euclidean Geometry: Pre-service Teachers’ van Hiele Experiences

Euclidean geometry is central to mathematics teacher education, yet many pre-service teachers struggle with geometric reasoning and proof. This qualitative follow-up study examined how 12 pre-service teachers from two Colleges of Education experienced learning geometry through either traditional instruction or a van Hiele phase-based model. Data from reflective journals and semi-structured interviews were analysed using interpretive thematic analysis. Findings revealed that van Hiele participants developed the ability to follow proof logic, trusted that difficulty would eventually make sense, described their learning as gradual, and left with a clear vision for teaching geometry. By contrast, traditional instruction participants described memorisation without understanding, disengagement when lost, and uncertainty about future teaching. The findings demonstrate that instructional design shapes not only what pre-service teachers know but also how they reason, persist, and imagine themselves as future geometry teachers. Implications for teacher education programmes are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematics Instruction Social Research and Opinion
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v5i4.1731
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Learning to Teach Euclidean Geometry: Pre-service Teachers’ van Hiele Experiences

Robert Benjamin Armah
1 links
Journal of Mathematics Instruction Social Research and Opinion
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Learning to Teach Euclidean Geometry: Pre-service Teachers’ van Hiele Experiences

Robert Benjamin Armah
article en

Abstract

Euclidean geometry is central to mathematics teacher education, yet many pre-service teachers struggle with geometric reasoning and proof. This qualitative follow-up study examined how 12 pre-service teachers from two Colleges of Education experienced learning geometry through either traditional instruction or a van Hiele phase-based model. Data from reflective journals and semi-structured interviews were analysed using interpretive thematic analysis. Findings revealed that van Hiele participants developed the ability to follow proof logic, trusted that difficulty would eventually make sense, described their learning as gradual, and left with a clear vision for teaching geometry. By contrast, traditional instruction participants described memorisation without understanding, disengagement when lost, and uncertainty about future teaching. The findings demonstrate that instructional design shapes not only what pre-service teachers know but also how they reason, persist, and imagine themselves as future geometry teachers. Implications for teacher education programmes are discussed.

Journal of Mathematics Instruction Social Research and OpinionVol. 5(4)
University of Education, Winneba (GH)
Quality education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon