Urban–Rural Gaps in Household Living Conditions in Nepal: Evidence from the 2022 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey

In 2022, 94 percent of rural Nepali households had electricity, while 21 percent used a clean main cooking fuel. Using 13,786 households from the 2022 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey, I compare nine living conditions across urban and rural municipalities. The largest urban advantages are in clean cooking fuel, finished floors, and finished walls. After adjusting for geography, household assets, and household-head characteristics, the gaps are 18, 15, and 13 percentage points. For housing materials and crowding, the estimated urban gap is 0.357 index points with an asset measure that excludes the outcomes. Adding the three building-material indicators to that measure lowers the estimate to 0.122. Nearly half of the households lacking clean cooking fuel, a finished floor, and finished walls live in urban municipalities. A rural-only rule would reach 51 percent of these households, while a rule based on missing at least one basic service would reach 41 percent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7zwv
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Urban–Rural Gaps in Household Living Conditions in Nepal: Evidence from the 2022 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey

Porokmi Sambahamphe
1 links
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Energy and Environment Impacts
preprint

Urban–Rural Gaps in Household Living Conditions in Nepal: Evidence from the 2022 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey

Porokmi Sambahamphe
preprint en

Abstract

In 2022, 94 percent of rural Nepali households had electricity, while 21 percent used a clean main cooking fuel. Using 13,786 households from the 2022 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey, I compare nine living conditions across urban and rural municipalities. The largest urban advantages are in clean cooking fuel, finished floors, and finished walls. After adjusting for geography, household assets, and household-head characteristics, the gaps are 18, 15, and 13 percentage points. For housing materials and crowding, the estimated urban gap is 0.357 index points with an asset measure that excludes the outcomes. Adding the three building-material indicators to that measure lowers the estimate to 0.122. Nearly half of the households lacking clean cooking fuel, a finished floor, and finished walls live in urban municipalities. A rural-only rule would reach 51 percent of these households, while a rule based on missing at least one basic service would reach 41 percent.

SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Reduced inequalities, No poverty, Sustainable cities and communities
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon