Casimir constraints in the EPRL spin foam model: the Y_γ map at small and large spin, and a proposed recolored embedding of SU(2) boundary spins into SL(2,ℂ) irreps

The EPRL spin foam model embeds an SU(2) boundary spin j into the lowest SU(2) subspace of a unitary principal-series representation of SL(2,ℂ) with (p,k) = (γj, j). This paper quantifies, for all j, how well this map and the alternative map p = γ(j+1) satisfy the Casimir form of the simplicity constraints. At small j the sign of the first Casimir is wrong (for γ = 0.274 and 0.2375 at j = 1/2 and 1), and at large j the absolute deviations grow linearly. Using Schur’s lemma, we show that no superposition of representations containing the SU(2) spin j can satisfy both weak conditions even on average. We give the exact continuous solution, and propose a heuristic “recolored” embedding at small j that removes the sign problem. We specify a numerical test and invite practitioners with spin foam codes to carry it out.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24056284
Primary Topic
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Casimir constraints in the EPRL spin foam model: the Y_γ map at small and large spin, and a proposed recolored embedding of SU(2) boundary spins into SL(2,ℂ) irreps

Michele Del Grosso
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
preprint

Casimir constraints in the EPRL spin foam model: the Y_γ map at small and large spin, and a proposed recolored embedding of SU(2) boundary spins into SL(2,ℂ) irreps

Michele Del Grosso
preprint en

Abstract

The EPRL spin foam model embeds an SU(2) boundary spin j into the lowest SU(2) subspace of a unitary principal-series representation of SL(2,ℂ) with (p,k) = (γj, j). This paper quantifies, for all j, how well this map and the alternative map p = γ(j+1) satisfy the Casimir form of the simplicity constraints. At small j the sign of the first Casimir is wrong (for γ = 0.274 and 0.2375 at j = 1/2 and 1), and at large j the absolute deviations grow linearly. Using Schur’s lemma, we show that no superposition of representations containing the SU(2) spin j can satisfy both weak conditions even on average. We give the exact continuous solution, and propose a heuristic “recolored” embedding at small j that removes the sign problem. We specify a numerical test and invite practitioners with spin foam codes to carry it out.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon