2026 AAMP Annual Scientific Session: New Classification of ORN / Tools for Interdisciplinary Diagnosis
New Classification of Osteoradionecrosis / Tools for Interdisciplinary Diagnosis C. David Fuller, MD, PhD — UT MD Anderson Cancer CenterModern radiotherapy has steadily improved head and neck cancer survival, shifting the clinical challenge toward survivorship; two-thirds of long-term survivors carry at least one moderate-to-severe toxicity. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORN) remains among the most consequential: it persists despite IMRT, its biology is incompletely explained by the classic Marx hypoxic-hypocellular-hypovascular and Delanian fibroatrophic models, no treatment is universally effective, and the economic burden runs from thousands of dollars for conservative care to roughly $170,000 for advanced surgical reconstruction. The mandible carries roughly six-fold higher risk than the maxilla owing to its single-vessel supply and dense cortical architecture.Progress has been hampered by definitional chaos: more than nine competing definitions, sixteen grading systems, and no dedicated ICD-10 code. The talk presents the response. The 2024 ISOO-MASCC-ASCO guideline provides an operational definition (radiographic lytic/sclerotic change, exposed bone, or bone probed through a fistula within an irradiated field). The ClinRad system (Watson et al., JCO 2024) stages ORN from minor bone spicules through Stage 0 (radiographic-only alveolar change) to Stage 3 (pathologic fracture or fistula), outperforming legacy systems and newly capturing maxillary and radiographic-only disease. A 69-expert ORAL Consortium Delphi study established consensus definitions and nine minimum data elements, while also exposing specialty-dependent “knowledge silos” in case staging.Diagnostic tools follow. A blinded interobserver study showed neither CT nor panoramic radiography alone suffices, but paired 2D/3D imaging raises AUC to 0.79–0.98 across specialties—though inter-rater agreement for ClinRad staging remains slight and confidence does not track accuracy. Quantitative approaches address this gap: voxel-level Hounsfield analysis (AUC 0.87), CT radiomics, DCE-MRI vascular biomarkers (Ktrans, Ve) with an FDA Biomarker Qualification letter of support, and black-bone/UTE MRI morphometry.Finally, risk models (IMPACT/RADMAP dental dosimetry, multi-institutional NTCP, an open ORN risk GUI) and stage-matched management culminate in a window-of-opportunity trial of pentoxifylline or cilostazol before surgery
Authors
- Clifton David Fuller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-3994)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2026-11-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34947190
- Primary Topic
- Oral health in cancer treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research