Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Gen-AI Competence Scale for Pre-Service Science Teachers

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) into education is transforming the competencies required of future teachers and creating a need for a robust multidimensional measure of Gen-AI competency. This study developed and validated a six-dimensional framework comprising output evaluation, use appropriateness, prompting & operation, technical integration, model literacy, and responsible practice among pre-service science teachers. Data were obtained from 426 biology, chemistry, and physics education students at Universitas Jambi, Indonesia. The responses were randomly split into EFA (n = 256; 60%) and CFA (n = 170; 40%) subsamples. An initial 84-item pool was evaluated through ten experts’ judgment using CVR and CVI, resulting in 63 content-valid items. The data were suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.972; Bartlett’s χ² = 20430.533; df = 1,953; p < 0.001), and EFA retained 33 items across six dimensions, with factor loadings of 0.502–0.811 and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.765–0.909. CFA supported the six-dimensional structure with acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.063, CFI = 0.913, TLI = 0.904, SRMR = 0.052). The dimensions demonstrated satisfactory reliability and convergent validity (α = 0.754–0.909; CR = 0.752–0.910; AVE = 0.505–0.611), while HTMT values of 0.586–0.874 supported discriminant validity. The resulting measure provides an empirically supported basis for profiling Gen-AI competency and strengthening teachers’ preparation for responsible Gen-AI use. Keywords: generative artificial intelligence, gen-AI competency, instrument validation, pre-service science teachers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v27i4.pp1968-1984
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Gen-AI Competence Scale for Pre-Service Science Teachers

Danial Mursyd, Erlida Amnie, Lely Mardiyanti
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Gen-AI Competence Scale for Pre-Service Science Teachers

Danial Mursyd, Erlida Amnie, Lely Mardiyanti
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) into education is transforming the competencies required of future teachers and creating a need for a robust multidimensional measure of Gen-AI competency. This study developed and validated a six-dimensional framework comprising output evaluation, use appropriateness, prompting & operation, technical integration, model literacy, and responsible practice among pre-service science teachers. Data were obtained from 426 biology, chemistry, and physics education students at Universitas Jambi, Indonesia. The responses were randomly split into EFA (n = 256; 60%) and CFA (n = 170; 40%) subsamples. An initial 84-item pool was evaluated through ten experts’ judgment using CVR and CVI, resulting in 63 content-valid items. The data were suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.972; Bartlett’s χ² = 20430.533; df = 1,953; p < 0.001), and EFA retained 33 items across six dimensions, with factor loadings of 0.502–0.811 and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.765–0.909. CFA supported the six-dimensional structure with acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.063, CFI = 0.913, TLI = 0.904, SRMR = 0.052). The dimensions demonstrated satisfactory reliability and convergent validity (α = 0.754–0.909; CR = 0.752–0.910; AVE = 0.505–0.611), while HTMT values of 0.586–0.874 supported discriminant validity. The resulting measure provides an empirically supported basis for profiling Gen-AI competency and strengthening teachers’ preparation for responsible Gen-AI use. Keywords: generative artificial intelligence, gen-AI competency, instrument validation, pre-service science teachers.

Jurnal Pendidikan MIPAVol. 27(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon