Does motor preparation influence word processing? Investigating the bidirectionality of action-language compatibility effects

According to theories of embodied cognition, people mentally simulate the described objects and events during comprehension. Most studies have shown an influence of linguistic processes on non-linguistic tasks. For example, people respond faster to words referring to objects usually found in an upper or lower location when referent location and response direction match. In six experiments, we investigated the reverse direction. We tested lexical decision times to up-/down-words while participants prepared an upward or downward movement of the arm. We did not find a compatibility effect in any of the experiments, even though participants did indeed prepare responses. Pre-activation of a response toward an upper or lower location thus does not necessarily facilitate responses in a lexical decision task with words referring to objects usually found in these positions. These findings suggest that any influence of movement preparation on lexical-semantic processing is substantially weaker or less robust than the converse influence of language processing on action, placing important constraints on strong embodied accounts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2026.2750836
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Does motor preparation influence word processing? Investigating the bidirectionality of action-language compatibility effects

Jessica Vanessa Strozyk, Hartmut Leuthold, Barbara Kaup, Jeff Miller et al.
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Does motor preparation influence word processing? Investigating the bidirectionality of action-language compatibility effects

Jessica Vanessa Strozyk, Hartmut Leuthold, Barbara Kaup, Jeff Miller, Daniel Bub
article en

Abstract

According to theories of embodied cognition, people mentally simulate the described objects and events during comprehension. Most studies have shown an influence of linguistic processes on non-linguistic tasks. For example, people respond faster to words referring to objects usually found in an upper or lower location when referent location and response direction match. In six experiments, we investigated the reverse direction. We tested lexical decision times to up-/down-words while participants prepared an upward or downward movement of the arm. We did not find a compatibility effect in any of the experiments, even though participants did indeed prepare responses. Pre-activation of a response toward an upper or lower location thus does not necessarily facilitate responses in a lexical decision task with words referring to objects usually found in these positions. These findings suggest that any influence of movement preparation on lexical-semantic processing is substantially weaker or less robust than the converse influence of language processing on action, placing important constraints on strong embodied accounts.

Journal of Cognitive Psychology
University of Victoria (CA), University of Otago (NZ), University of Tübingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon