Indian Diplomacy: Caste, Ambedkar and Buddhist Diplomacy

In postcolonial nations like India, foreign policy and diplomacy have traditionally held a normative space apart from the supposedly “hard” power politics of the Cold War era. Following Pt. Nehru, also referred to as Nehruvian Socialism, the ruling elites in India have historically hegemonized discourse and policies in accordance with the subcontinent’s hierarchical Brahmanical framework. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s departure from the Nehru administration signalled his disapproval of Indian diplomacy that was tilted towards authoritarian communism and socialism. The pragmatic approach, advocacy for the unity of “leagues of democracies,” and his conversion to Buddhism further underscored the need for an alternative perspective of the Indian state in handling international affairs. While the Indian establishment tried to understand the importance of Buddhism in reaching out to other worlds especially South-East Asian societies, the current regime went one step further in displaying its keen interests to engage other world with the ideals and identity of Buddha. Interestingly, the Modi regime and his ideological underpinnings not only have serious limitations over Buddhist philosophy but it mischievously propagated Brahmanical Hinduism in better light through Buddhist roots and civilisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CASTE / A Global Journal on Social Exclusion
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26812/caste.v7i2.2772
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Indian Diplomacy: Caste, Ambedkar and Buddhist Diplomacy

Chandra Sen
5 links
CASTE / A Global Journal on Social Exclusion
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
article

Indian Diplomacy: Caste, Ambedkar and Buddhist Diplomacy

Chandra Sen
article en

Abstract

In postcolonial nations like India, foreign policy and diplomacy have traditionally held a normative space apart from the supposedly “hard” power politics of the Cold War era. Following Pt. Nehru, also referred to as Nehruvian Socialism, the ruling elites in India have historically hegemonized discourse and policies in accordance with the subcontinent’s hierarchical Brahmanical framework. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s departure from the Nehru administration signalled his disapproval of Indian diplomacy that was tilted towards authoritarian communism and socialism. The pragmatic approach, advocacy for the unity of “leagues of democracies,” and his conversion to Buddhism further underscored the need for an alternative perspective of the Indian state in handling international affairs. While the Indian establishment tried to understand the importance of Buddhism in reaching out to other worlds especially South-East Asian societies, the current regime went one step further in displaying its keen interests to engage other world with the ideals and identity of Buddha. Interestingly, the Modi regime and his ideological underpinnings not only have serious limitations over Buddhist philosophy but it mischievously propagated Brahmanical Hinduism in better light through Buddhist roots and civilisation.

CASTE / A Global Journal on Social ExclusionVol. 7(2)
Gautam Buddha University (IN)
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Indian Diplomacy: Caste, Ambedkar and Buddhist Diplomacy — Chandra Sen · CASTE / A Global Journal on Social Exclusion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS