Awareness, Not Seniority, Is Associated With Change in Tourniquet Practice for Ankle Fracture Fixation: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

IntroductionRecent randomised evidence and the 2021 British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) have questioned routine, unselective tourniquet use.This study aimed to describe tourniquet practice in ankle fracture fixation and identify factors associated with evidence-and guideline-concordant practice. MethodologyAn international cross-sectional online survey of orthopaedic surgeons who perform ankle fracture fixation was distributed through the OrthoXcel Collaborator Network between 10 May and 4 June 2026.It covered tourniquet practice, awareness of recent evidence and of BOAST, local policy and willingness to change.Associations were tested with χ², Fisher's exact and trend tests and logistic regression. ResultsIn all, 85 surgeons from four countries responded (United Kingdom 45, Egypt 29, India 6, UAE 5; 26 consultants, 26 specialty doctors and 33 trainees).Overall, 75/85 (88.2%) used a tourniquet routinely, with no difference by grade (p = 0.677).Only 17/85 (20.0%) were fully aware of recent randomised evidence and 44/85 (51.8%) of BOAST, and 11/85 (12.9%) reported a local policy.Of routine users, 58/75 (77.3%) used a fixed pressure rather than one individualised to systolic blood pressure.Reported practice change rose from 13.9% among surgeons unaware of the evidence to 58.8% among those fully aware (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 10.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-42.4),and BOAST application rose from 13.6% to 85.0% with BOAST awareness (adjusted OR 33.6; 95% CI 5.3-214.0).Grade, experience and country were not independently associated with either outcome.BOAST appliers more often individualised pressure ((14/42, 33.3% vs. 3/33, 9.1%; P = 0.014).Most routine users (66/75, 88.0%) were open to change. ConclusionsRoutine thigh tourniquet use at a fixed pressure remains the norm in ankle fracture fixation, with little institutional governance.Awareness, rather than seniority, was associated with change.Targeted dissemination of the evidence and BOAST, supported by local policies, is a practical lever while definitive trials are awaited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.119305
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Awareness, Not Seniority, Is Associated With Change in Tourniquet Practice for Ankle Fracture Fixation: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Tamer Kamal, Ahmed Abdelkarim, Somok Banerjee, Nayeem Zafar Hali et al.
Cureus
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Awareness, Not Seniority, Is Associated With Change in Tourniquet Practice for Ankle Fracture Fixation: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Tamer Kamal, Ahmed Abdelkarim, Somok Banerjee, Nayeem Zafar Hali, Mohamed Abdo Khalafallah, Mohamed Hashem, Mohamed Khairy El-Mesery, Omar Taha, Mohamed Elgamal, Ahmed Shaalan
article en

Abstract

IntroductionRecent randomised evidence and the 2021 British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) have questioned routine, unselective tourniquet use.This study aimed to describe tourniquet practice in ankle fracture fixation and identify factors associated with evidence-and guideline-concordant practice. MethodologyAn international cross-sectional online survey of orthopaedic surgeons who perform ankle fracture fixation was distributed through the OrthoXcel Collaborator Network between 10 May and 4 June 2026.It covered tourniquet practice, awareness of recent evidence and of BOAST, local policy and willingness to change.Associations were tested with χ², Fisher's exact and trend tests and logistic regression. ResultsIn all, 85 surgeons from four countries responded (United Kingdom 45, Egypt 29, India 6, UAE 5; 26 consultants, 26 specialty doctors and 33 trainees).Overall, 75/85 (88.2%) used a tourniquet routinely, with no difference by grade (p = 0.677).Only 17/85 (20.0%) were fully aware of recent randomised evidence and 44/85 (51.8%) of BOAST, and 11/85 (12.9%) reported a local policy.Of routine users, 58/75 (77.3%) used a fixed pressure rather than one individualised to systolic blood pressure.Reported practice change rose from 13.9% among surgeons unaware of the evidence to 58.8% among those fully aware (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 10.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-42.4),and BOAST application rose from 13.6% to 85.0% with BOAST awareness (adjusted OR 33.6; 95% CI 5.3-214.0).Grade, experience and country were not independently associated with either outcome.BOAST appliers more often individualised pressure ((14/42, 33.3% vs. 3/33, 9.1%; P = 0.014).Most routine users (66/75, 88.0%) were open to change. ConclusionsRoutine thigh tourniquet use at a fixed pressure remains the norm in ankle fracture fixation, with little institutional governance.Awareness, rather than seniority, was associated with change.Targeted dissemination of the evidence and BOAST, supported by local policies, is a practical lever while definitive trials are awaited.

Cureus
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN), Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust (GB), Royal Cornwall Hospital (GB), Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (GB), Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital (GB), East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Alexandria University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon