Can pure-gas permeability data design a mixed-gas module? A correctability map for dual-mode CO2/N2 transport in Matrimid 5218 hollow fibres

Abstract Pure-gas permeabilities are routinely used to size polymeric gas-separation modules, although permeation in glassy polymers depends on pressure and composition through dual-mode sorption. This work asks whether any choice of pure-gas measurement pressure can make such data reproduce mixed-gas module performance, using CO 2 /N 2 in Matrimid 5218 as a case study. An exact partial-immobilization flux with competitive sorption on both membrane faces was embedded in a mass-balance-verified counter-current hollow-fibre model. The governing mobility parameter F·K was calibrated against two independent literature datasets (0.191; 90% confidence interval 0.123–0.272), whereas a single-laboratory literature value (0.859) failed a held-out test. With pure-gas data taken at 1 bar, the design overestimated CO 2 recovery by 2.5 to 3.5 percentage points (1.7–4.8 across the F·K interval) and CO 2 purity by 0.7–1.2 points, corresponding to modules undersized by 5.6–9.6% of the area actually required. Whether this bias can be removed by choosing another measurement pressure depends jointly on feed CO 2 partial pressure and stage cut. At stage cuts of about 10–13%, no measurement pressure corrects the design below a feed CO 2 partial pressure of about 0.84 bar, and correction within 20 bar requires more than about 1.64 bar; this uncorrectable regime contracts with increasing stage cut and was not observed above roughly 18%. It arises where competitive sorption depresses the local mixed-gas CO 2 permeability below the pure-gas Henry's-law limit. Higher temperature reduces the bias but costs more in selectivity. The results identify where mixed-gas characterization cannot be replaced by pure-gas testing. Mapped onto industrial CO₂ sources at 10 bar feed, natural-gas combined-cycle flue gas falls in the uncorrectable regime, coal flue gas in a regime correctable only by impractically high test pressures, and enriched or cement-kiln feeds in a regime correctable by routine testing. A screening procedure is proposed that tells the designer, before any module is sized, whether vendor pure-gas data are adequate, require a stated area margin, or must be replaced by mixed-gas measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11646086/v1
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Can pure-gas permeability data design a mixed-gas module? A correctability map for dual-mode CO2/N2 transport in Matrimid 5218 hollow fibres

Miracle Victory Ajoku, George Chukwuebuka Duru, Modade Sola-Ojo
Research Square
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
preprint

Can pure-gas permeability data design a mixed-gas module? A correctability map for dual-mode CO2/N2 transport in Matrimid 5218 hollow fibres

Miracle Victory Ajoku, George Chukwuebuka Duru, Modade Sola-Ojo
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Pure-gas permeabilities are routinely used to size polymeric gas-separation modules, although permeation in glassy polymers depends on pressure and composition through dual-mode sorption. This work asks whether any choice of pure-gas measurement pressure can make such data reproduce mixed-gas module performance, using CO 2 /N 2 in Matrimid 5218 as a case study. An exact partial-immobilization flux with competitive sorption on both membrane faces was embedded in a mass-balance-verified counter-current hollow-fibre model. The governing mobility parameter F·K was calibrated against two independent literature datasets (0.191; 90% confidence interval 0.123–0.272), whereas a single-laboratory literature value (0.859) failed a held-out test. With pure-gas data taken at 1 bar, the design overestimated CO 2 recovery by 2.5 to 3.5 percentage points (1.7–4.8 across the F·K interval) and CO 2 purity by 0.7–1.2 points, corresponding to modules undersized by 5.6–9.6% of the area actually required. Whether this bias can be removed by choosing another measurement pressure depends jointly on feed CO 2 partial pressure and stage cut. At stage cuts of about 10–13%, no measurement pressure corrects the design below a feed CO 2 partial pressure of about 0.84 bar, and correction within 20 bar requires more than about 1.64 bar; this uncorrectable regime contracts with increasing stage cut and was not observed above roughly 18%. It arises where competitive sorption depresses the local mixed-gas CO 2 permeability below the pure-gas Henry's-law limit. Higher temperature reduces the bias but costs more in selectivity. The results identify where mixed-gas characterization cannot be replaced by pure-gas testing. Mapped onto industrial CO₂ sources at 10 bar feed, natural-gas combined-cycle flue gas falls in the uncorrectable regime, coal flue gas in a regime correctable only by impractically high test pressures, and enriched or cement-kiln feeds in a regime correctable by routine testing. A screening procedure is proposed that tells the designer, before any module is sized, whether vendor pure-gas data are adequate, require a stated area margin, or must be replaced by mixed-gas measurements.

Research Square
Federal University of Technology Owerri (NG), Landmark University (NG)
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon