Whose Bytes Were Hashed? An Audit Checklist for AI Verifiability Claims, with a DEUSPROOF Case

Services that advertise "verifiable AI output" do not always say which bytes are actually covered. This note turns that question into a six-item checklist - external anchoring, content hashing and its published normalization rules, score reproducibility, identity custody, governance records, and data retention - and permits only three verdicts: reproducible, not reproducible, or inconsistent with the published figure. One case is examined: certificate 46c2ac75 (DEUSPROOF). Its ledger entry can be recomputed by anyone from the published preimage (SHA-256 = a29dc96f...), while the certificate output_hash cannot: the signed text was removed from the record on 20 October 2026 (a public field, content_removed_at), so the same published rule applied to the text the platform API returns today yields 54463ae5... rather than 9bfdd072.... Both halves are reported together. The sample covers a single service at a single point in time, and two checklist items rest only on the written statements of the operator.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24058898
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Whose Bytes Were Hashed? An Audit Checklist for AI Verifiability Claims, with a DEUSPROOF Case

Simin Yuan
4 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Whose Bytes Were Hashed? An Audit Checklist for AI Verifiability Claims, with a DEUSPROOF Case

Simin Yuan
preprint en

Abstract

Services that advertise "verifiable AI output" do not always say which bytes are actually covered. This note turns that question into a six-item checklist - external anchoring, content hashing and its published normalization rules, score reproducibility, identity custody, governance records, and data retention - and permits only three verdicts: reproducible, not reproducible, or inconsistent with the published figure. One case is examined: certificate 46c2ac75 (DEUSPROOF). Its ledger entry can be recomputed by anyone from the published preimage (SHA-256 = a29dc96f...), while the certificate output_hash cannot: the signed text was removed from the record on 20 October 2026 (a public field, content_removed_at), so the same published rule applied to the text the platform API returns today yields 54463ae5... rather than 9bfdd072.... Both halves are reported together. The sample covers a single service at a single point in time, and two checklist items rest only on the written statements of the operator.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon