Multi-rater assessment of entrustable professional activities among novice nurses in a standardised training programme: A cross-sectional study

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) connect observable clinical work with decisions about the supervision a learner requires. Evidence remains limited on how EPA ratings assigned to novice nurses differ among assessment roles and how closely those ratings agree. This cross-sectional study analysed 215 complete triads comprising a novice nurse, clinical mentor and nurse manager at a tertiary teaching hospital in China. Twelve EPAs were rated using a five-level ordinal entrustment scale. Role-related differences were examined using Friedman tests followed, when indicated, by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Agreement was evaluated separately using linear-weighted kappa, exact agreement and within-one-level agreement. Independent training-year cohorts and clinical specialties were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Holm adjustment was applied to groups of related tests, while Bonferroni adjustment was used for the three post-hoc role comparisons within each EPA. Rating distributions differed among roles for 10 of 12 EPAs after Holm adjustment, although Kendall’s W values were small. Linear-weighted kappa ranged from − 0.036 to 0.316; exact agreement ranged from 39.1% to 70.2%, while within-one-level agreement ranged from 87.4% to 100.0%. All 36 EPA-by-role omnibus comparisons across training-year cohorts were significant after Holm adjustment, whereas a specialty difference remained only for nurse-manager ratings of EPA7. No adverse-event comparison remained significant after multiplicity adjustment. The three assessment roles provided distinct perspectives, with generally low chance-corrected agreement. The findings support cautious interpretation of multisource ratings, explicit rater calibration and prospective evaluation of stage-specific benchmarks. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine individual development and determine whether EPA ratings predict subsequent adverse events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10767-w
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Multi-rater assessment of entrustable professional activities among novice nurses in a standardised training programme: A cross-sectional study

Meng Zhang, Xin Qi, Haidan Cheng, Junye Tian et al.
1 links
BMC Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Multi-rater assessment of entrustable professional activities among novice nurses in a standardised training programme: A cross-sectional study

Meng Zhang, Xin Qi, Haidan Cheng, Junye Tian, Qian Lu
article en

Abstract

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) connect observable clinical work with decisions about the supervision a learner requires. Evidence remains limited on how EPA ratings assigned to novice nurses differ among assessment roles and how closely those ratings agree. This cross-sectional study analysed 215 complete triads comprising a novice nurse, clinical mentor and nurse manager at a tertiary teaching hospital in China. Twelve EPAs were rated using a five-level ordinal entrustment scale. Role-related differences were examined using Friedman tests followed, when indicated, by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Agreement was evaluated separately using linear-weighted kappa, exact agreement and within-one-level agreement. Independent training-year cohorts and clinical specialties were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Holm adjustment was applied to groups of related tests, while Bonferroni adjustment was used for the three post-hoc role comparisons within each EPA. Rating distributions differed among roles for 10 of 12 EPAs after Holm adjustment, although Kendall’s W values were small. Linear-weighted kappa ranged from − 0.036 to 0.316; exact agreement ranged from 39.1% to 70.2%, while within-one-level agreement ranged from 87.4% to 100.0%. All 36 EPA-by-role omnibus comparisons across training-year cohorts were significant after Holm adjustment, whereas a specialty difference remained only for nurse-manager ratings of EPA7. No adverse-event comparison remained significant after multiplicity adjustment. The three assessment roles provided distinct perspectives, with generally low chance-corrected agreement. The findings support cautious interpretation of multisource ratings, explicit rater calibration and prospective evaluation of stage-specific benchmarks. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine individual development and determine whether EPA ratings predict subsequent adverse events.

BMC Medical Education
Peking University (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Peking University First Hospital
Good health and well-being, Quality education
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon