The Recoverable Agent: Immune-like defence, sleep-like maintenance and bounded autonomy

AI agents can execute consequential actions faster than organisations can investigate and approve a response. This paper proposes a conceptual architecture in which compartmentalised agents operate alongside two complementary processes: continuous, immune-like protection and periodic or event-triggered, sleep-like maintenance. The protective process enforces delegated authority, detects selected deviations and isolates affected compartments. The maintenance process suspends external action, examines memory provenance, removes disposable state, restores trustworthy records, rebuilds suspect components and tests readiness before reactivation. Both are supervised by a protected control plane outside the working agent's authority. Essential work may transfer to clean reserve compartments, but potentially compromised agent state does not migrate by default. The proposal connects technical controls with GCTI's proposed Red-Team Assessor (RTA) and AI Security Operator (AISO) roles. Its central claim is conditional: pre-authorised containment can remove a human approval step from the immediate response path, but cannot eliminate detection uncertainty, guarantee instantaneous repair or reverse completed harm. Biological sleep and immunity provide a functional analogy, not evidence that software sleeps, experiences fatigue or becomes conscious. The paper distinguishes autonomous immunity from autoimmunity, treats harmful defensive reactions as a first-class risk, and sets out falsifiable hypotheses and a prospective evaluation protocol. No implementation, experiment or measured effectiveness is reported. The contribution is an integrated, testable account of bounded action, recoverable state and professional accountability, rather than a claim to have invented self-healing computing or achieved invulnerability. Final conceptual research report. Not peer reviewed. No implementation, experiment or measured effectiveness is reported. Declared interests and AI-assistance disclosures appear in the paper.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24061024
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Recoverable Agent: Immune-like defence, sleep-like maintenance and bounded autonomy

B. Fischer
4 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Security and Verification in Computing
article

The Recoverable Agent: Immune-like defence, sleep-like maintenance and bounded autonomy

B. Fischer
article en

Abstract

AI agents can execute consequential actions faster than organisations can investigate and approve a response. This paper proposes a conceptual architecture in which compartmentalised agents operate alongside two complementary processes: continuous, immune-like protection and periodic or event-triggered, sleep-like maintenance. The protective process enforces delegated authority, detects selected deviations and isolates affected compartments. The maintenance process suspends external action, examines memory provenance, removes disposable state, restores trustworthy records, rebuilds suspect components and tests readiness before reactivation. Both are supervised by a protected control plane outside the working agent's authority. Essential work may transfer to clean reserve compartments, but potentially compromised agent state does not migrate by default. The proposal connects technical controls with GCTI's proposed Red-Team Assessor (RTA) and AI Security Operator (AISO) roles. Its central claim is conditional: pre-authorised containment can remove a human approval step from the immediate response path, but cannot eliminate detection uncertainty, guarantee instantaneous repair or reverse completed harm. Biological sleep and immunity provide a functional analogy, not evidence that software sleeps, experiences fatigue or becomes conscious. The paper distinguishes autonomous immunity from autoimmunity, treats harmful defensive reactions as a first-class risk, and sets out falsifiable hypotheses and a prospective evaluation protocol. No implementation, experiment or measured effectiveness is reported. The contribution is an integrated, testable account of bounded action, recoverable state and professional accountability, rather than a claim to have invented self-healing computing or achieved invulnerability. Final conceptual research report. Not peer reviewed. No implementation, experiment or measured effectiveness is reported. Declared interests and AI-assistance disclosures appear in the paper.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon