Global Collective Pessimism: People predict a dystopian future and attribute it to political leaders

Personal optimism is widespread. This research provides cross-cultural evidence for collective pessimism. Across four pre-registered experiments in 40 countries (N = 52,508), people believed it is much more likely that a future dystopian society will materialize than a utopian society. Dystopian predictions were driven not by internal attribution, but by asymmetric external attribution: People believed political leaders in society can exert greater influence on dystopian than utopian world development, and high leader impact was correlationally and causally linked to higher scenario likelihood. Text-based analyses revealed that participants named a political leader nearly twice as often in dystopias than utopias, and such personalized dystopias were considered more likely. Dystopian predictions were stronger among left-leaning individuals and in rich democracies, yet generalized across ideologies and world regions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rh6ne_v2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Global Collective Pessimism: People predict a dystopian future and attribute it to political leaders

Hallgeir Sjåstad, Ann‐Cathrin Coenen, Jonas R. Kunst
1 links
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Social and Intergroup Psychology
preprint

Global Collective Pessimism: People predict a dystopian future and attribute it to political leaders

Hallgeir Sjåstad, Ann‐Cathrin Coenen, Jonas R. Kunst
preprint en

Abstract

Personal optimism is widespread. This research provides cross-cultural evidence for collective pessimism. Across four pre-registered experiments in 40 countries (N = 52,508), people believed it is much more likely that a future dystopian society will materialize than a utopian society. Dystopian predictions were driven not by internal attribution, but by asymmetric external attribution: People believed political leaders in society can exert greater influence on dystopian than utopian world development, and high leader impact was correlationally and causally linked to higher scenario likelihood. Text-based analyses revealed that participants named a political leader nearly twice as often in dystopias than utopias, and such personalized dystopias were considered more likely. Dystopian predictions were stronger among left-leaning individuals and in rich democracies, yet generalized across ideologies and world regions.

PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon