Guard-Aware Trajectory Candidate Selection for Vision-Language Autonomous Driving: Safety-Constrained Chain-of-Causation

Driving VLMs use Chain-of-Causation (CoC) to link scenes to behavior, but CoC may omit when a trajectory is executable. We propose Safety-Constrained CoC, appending a natural-language guard with activation, invariant, bound, prohibition, release, fallback, and termination clauses. Given a scene, CoC, guard, and trajectory candidates, the model selects one candidate; an external deterministic verifier compares its measurements with the guard. Our paired-contract benchmark changes only the guard while fixing the scene, objective, and candidates. In three-seed temporal tests with LoRA-tuned Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct, the violation rate decreased from 0.319 without a guard to 0.000, while compliant completion and paired accuracy reached 1.000. For unseen time values, candidate accuracy, violation rate, and paired accuracy were 0.635, 0.351, and 0.306. The results support guard-conditioned synthetic candidate selection, not continuous trajectory generation or vehicle-level safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5370/kiee.2026.75.11.2987
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Guard-Aware Trajectory Candidate Selection for Vision-Language Autonomous Driving: Safety-Constrained Chain-of-Causation

Jinhyun Kim
The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
article

Guard-Aware Trajectory Candidate Selection for Vision-Language Autonomous Driving: Safety-Constrained Chain-of-Causation

Jinhyun Kim
article en

Abstract

Driving VLMs use Chain-of-Causation (CoC) to link scenes to behavior, but CoC may omit when a trajectory is executable. We propose Safety-Constrained CoC, appending a natural-language guard with activation, invariant, bound, prohibition, release, fallback, and termination clauses. Given a scene, CoC, guard, and trajectory candidates, the model selects one candidate; an external deterministic verifier compares its measurements with the guard. Our paired-contract benchmark changes only the guard while fixing the scene, objective, and candidates. In three-seed temporal tests with LoRA-tuned Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct, the violation rate decreased from 0.319 without a guard to 0.000, while compliant completion and paired accuracy reached 1.000. For unseen time values, candidate accuracy, violation rate, and paired accuracy were 0.635, 0.351, and 0.306. The results support guard-conditioned synthetic candidate selection, not continuous trajectory generation or vehicle-level safety.

The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical EngineersVol. 75(11)
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon