Tianxia and the Polis: a comparative and historical epistemology of Guanxi

Abstract This paper develops an epistemological framework for understanding guanxi . Moving beyond a purely methodological construct, it examines the ethical foundations of guanxi , its dual subjective responses to universalistic and particularistic moral obligations, and its intersubjective role in negotiating uncertainty. The paper argues that guanxi represents a reflexive force through which social life becomes capable of reflection, and also contrasts the tianxia worldview with the Greek conception of the polis , thereby illuminating their divergent yet potentially complementary approaches to the recurring entanglement of rationality and theology throughout human history. Rather than treating guanxi as mere instrumentality or a cultural peculiarity, this analysis emphasizes its grounding in virtue ethics, intersubjectivity, and lived practice. It argues that guanxi constitutes an irreducible concept essential to comparative social theory. By undertaking an epistemological inquiry into guanxi , this study attempts to open new pathways for dialogue on the foundations of human interaction and calls for a re-engagement with the legacy of classical (Chinese) sociology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chinese Sociology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-026-00275-1
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Tianxia and the Polis: a comparative and historical epistemology of Guanxi

Qiang Fu
The Journal of Chinese Sociology
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Tianxia and the Polis: a comparative and historical epistemology of Guanxi

Qiang Fu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops an epistemological framework for understanding guanxi . Moving beyond a purely methodological construct, it examines the ethical foundations of guanxi , its dual subjective responses to universalistic and particularistic moral obligations, and its intersubjective role in negotiating uncertainty. The paper argues that guanxi represents a reflexive force through which social life becomes capable of reflection, and also contrasts the tianxia worldview with the Greek conception of the polis , thereby illuminating their divergent yet potentially complementary approaches to the recurring entanglement of rationality and theology throughout human history. Rather than treating guanxi as mere instrumentality or a cultural peculiarity, this analysis emphasizes its grounding in virtue ethics, intersubjectivity, and lived practice. It argues that guanxi constitutes an irreducible concept essential to comparative social theory. By undertaking an epistemological inquiry into guanxi , this study attempts to open new pathways for dialogue on the foundations of human interaction and calls for a re-engagement with the legacy of classical (Chinese) sociology.

The Journal of Chinese SociologyVol. 13(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon