Beyond Organizational Justice: A Systemic Justice Framework for Understanding Persistent Barriers to Black Employees’ Selection and Promotion

Persistent racial inequalities in recruitment, selection and promotion remain evident despite decades of equality legislation, diversity initiatives and organizational reform. While Organizational Justice Theory has advanced understanding of employees’ perceptions and experiences of fairness, it offers a less developed explanation of how organizational systems reproduce inequality over time. This study addresses this limitation by developing a Systemic Justice Framework that extends organizational justice scholarship beyond individual fairness perceptions to the organizational and institutional mechanisms that sustain racial inequality. Drawing on an interpretivist qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 Black professionals employed across the UK National Health Service and higher education sector. Data were analysed inductively using Gioia’s methodology and Colaizzi’s phenomenological approach. The findings reveal interconnected forms of procedural, distributive, interpersonal and informational injustice. More importantly, they identify five systemic mechanisms through which inequality is reproduced: leadership accountability failures, HR governance conflicts, organizational cultures of racial normalization, informal power networks and white solidarity, and wider institutional influences. These mechanisms interact recursively, transforming isolated experiences of unfairness into enduring organizational patterns that constrain career progression despite formal commitments to equality. Building on these findings, the study proposes a preliminary Systemic Justice Framework that requires further empirical testing and refinement. The framework contributes to organizational justice, leadership and strategic human resource management scholarship by providing a multi-level explanation of how organizational systems sustain racial inequality and offers practical guidance for governance reforms that strengthen accountability, transparency and organizational learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Societal & Behavioral Research Journal
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63329/av3nz12340
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Beyond Organizational Justice: A Systemic Justice Framework for Understanding Persistent Barriers to Black Employees’ Selection and Promotion

Favour U. O. Evwerhamre, Rachael M. Adeleye
2 links
Scientific Societal & Behavioral Research Journal
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Beyond Organizational Justice: A Systemic Justice Framework for Understanding Persistent Barriers to Black Employees’ Selection and Promotion

Favour U. O. Evwerhamre, Rachael M. Adeleye
article en

Abstract

Persistent racial inequalities in recruitment, selection and promotion remain evident despite decades of equality legislation, diversity initiatives and organizational reform. While Organizational Justice Theory has advanced understanding of employees’ perceptions and experiences of fairness, it offers a less developed explanation of how organizational systems reproduce inequality over time. This study addresses this limitation by developing a Systemic Justice Framework that extends organizational justice scholarship beyond individual fairness perceptions to the organizational and institutional mechanisms that sustain racial inequality. Drawing on an interpretivist qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 Black professionals employed across the UK National Health Service and higher education sector. Data were analysed inductively using Gioia’s methodology and Colaizzi’s phenomenological approach. The findings reveal interconnected forms of procedural, distributive, interpersonal and informational injustice. More importantly, they identify five systemic mechanisms through which inequality is reproduced: leadership accountability failures, HR governance conflicts, organizational cultures of racial normalization, informal power networks and white solidarity, and wider institutional influences. These mechanisms interact recursively, transforming isolated experiences of unfairness into enduring organizational patterns that constrain career progression despite formal commitments to equality. Building on these findings, the study proposes a preliminary Systemic Justice Framework that requires further empirical testing and refinement. The framework contributes to organizational justice, leadership and strategic human resource management scholarship by providing a multi-level explanation of how organizational systems sustain racial inequality and offers practical guidance for governance reforms that strengthen accountability, transparency and organizational learning.

Scientific Societal & Behavioral Research JournalVol. 2(2)
Buckinghamshire New University (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon