A Three-Level Meta-Analysis On Household Food Processing, Phytate Reduction and In Vitro Iron and Zinc Bioaccessibility in Cereals, Legumes and Composite Matrices.

ABSTRACT Phytic acid (myo-inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate, InsP6) chelates iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in the intestinal lumen, severely constraining mineral bioaccessibility from cereal and legume staples. This quantitative three-level meta-analysis evaluated the pooled impact of traditional household processing techniques on in vitro Fe and Zn bioaccessibility, partitioned variance across hierarchical levels, and assessed potential moderation by mineral species, processing method, assay construct, and percentage phytate degradation. A total of 108 effect sizes (k = 108) nested within 54 pairwise comparisons (m = 54) across 6 independent primary studies (s = 6) were analyzed using log response ratios (LRR) fitted via restricted maximum likelihood in a three-level random-effects framework, incorporating small-sample containment degrees of freedom, CR2 cluster-robust variance estimation, and shared-control sensitivity analyses (rho = 0.0 to 0.7). The overall pooled LRR was 0.2151 (SE = 0.0996; 95% CI: -0.0411 to 0.4712; p = 0.0833), corresponding to a response ratio (RR) of 1.2400 (95% CI: 0.9598 to 1.6020), reflecting an imprecise +24.00% positive tendency (CR2 robust p = 0.106). Multilevel variance partitioning indicated that total heterogeneity was concentrated within studies at the comparison (58.75%) and outcome (33.14%) levels, with between-study differences accounting for 7.04% and sampling error for 1.07%. Iron bioaccessibility responded more strongly (+38.43%; RR = 1.3843) than zinc (+13.50%; RR = 1.1350; contrast p = 0.0732). Among processing techniques, germination (RR = 1.4947) and combined multi-step processing (RR = 1.3827) demonstrated the largest enhancements relative to soaking (RR = 1.0981), whereas thermal cooking alone reduced bioaccessibility (RR = 0.7871). Meta-regression indicated that percentage phytate reduction did not significantly predict bioaccessibility gains (slope: 0.0471 per 10% reduction, p = 0.273; pseudo-R2 = 0.00%), while leave-one-study-out sensitivity models remained positive throughout (RR range: 1.1748 to 1.3409). In conclusion, household processing tends to enhance in vitro Fe and Zn bioaccessibility, with germination and combined schedules showing the greatest potential, but total phytate removal alone is an inadequate proxy for mineral release without direct bioaccessibility quantification. Keywords: Phytic Acid; Meta-Analysis; Three-Level Model; Iron Bioaccessibility; Zinc Bioaccessibility; Food Processing; Germination; In Vitro Digestion; Cereals; Legumes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24058094
Primary Topic
Phytase and its Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

A Three-Level Meta-Analysis On Household Food Processing, Phytate Reduction and In Vitro Iron and Zinc Bioaccessibility in Cereals, Legumes and Composite Matrices.

Nelson Adetomiwa Adeniyi
4 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Phytase and its Applications
preprint

A Three-Level Meta-Analysis On Household Food Processing, Phytate Reduction and In Vitro Iron and Zinc Bioaccessibility in Cereals, Legumes and Composite Matrices.

Nelson Adetomiwa Adeniyi
preprint en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Phytic acid (myo-inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate, InsP6) chelates iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in the intestinal lumen, severely constraining mineral bioaccessibility from cereal and legume staples. This quantitative three-level meta-analysis evaluated the pooled impact of traditional household processing techniques on in vitro Fe and Zn bioaccessibility, partitioned variance across hierarchical levels, and assessed potential moderation by mineral species, processing method, assay construct, and percentage phytate degradation. A total of 108 effect sizes (k = 108) nested within 54 pairwise comparisons (m = 54) across 6 independent primary studies (s = 6) were analyzed using log response ratios (LRR) fitted via restricted maximum likelihood in a three-level random-effects framework, incorporating small-sample containment degrees of freedom, CR2 cluster-robust variance estimation, and shared-control sensitivity analyses (rho = 0.0 to 0.7). The overall pooled LRR was 0.2151 (SE = 0.0996; 95% CI: -0.0411 to 0.4712; p = 0.0833), corresponding to a response ratio (RR) of 1.2400 (95% CI: 0.9598 to 1.6020), reflecting an imprecise +24.00% positive tendency (CR2 robust p = 0.106). Multilevel variance partitioning indicated that total heterogeneity was concentrated within studies at the comparison (58.75%) and outcome (33.14%) levels, with between-study differences accounting for 7.04% and sampling error for 1.07%. Iron bioaccessibility responded more strongly (+38.43%; RR = 1.3843) than zinc (+13.50%; RR = 1.1350; contrast p = 0.0732). Among processing techniques, germination (RR = 1.4947) and combined multi-step processing (RR = 1.3827) demonstrated the largest enhancements relative to soaking (RR = 1.0981), whereas thermal cooking alone reduced bioaccessibility (RR = 0.7871). Meta-regression indicated that percentage phytate reduction did not significantly predict bioaccessibility gains (slope: 0.0471 per 10% reduction, p = 0.273; pseudo-R2 = 0.00%), while leave-one-study-out sensitivity models remained positive throughout (RR range: 1.1748 to 1.3409). In conclusion, household processing tends to enhance in vitro Fe and Zn bioaccessibility, with germination and combined schedules showing the greatest potential, but total phytate removal alone is an inadequate proxy for mineral release without direct bioaccessibility quantification. Keywords: Phytic Acid; Meta-Analysis; Three-Level Model; Iron Bioaccessibility; Zinc Bioaccessibility; Food Processing; Germination; In Vitro Digestion; Cereals; Legumes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zero hunger
Phytase and its Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon