HISTORICAL TRUTH AND THE SEMANTICS OF THE LITERARY TEXT IN FITRAT’S DRAMA “ABULFAYZXON”

This article investigates the relationship between historical truth and literary-text semantics in Abdurauf Fitrat’s drama Abulfayzkhan. Using close reading, historical-contextual interpretation, narratological comparison and semantic analysis, it distinguishes the historical referent of the late Ashtarkhanid court from the meanings produced by dramatic dialogue, conflict and characterization. The analysis identifies three interrelated semantic axes: the crisis of legitimate rule, the moral consequences of coercive power, and the collective vulnerability produced by political fragmentation. The drama is treated neither as a transparent historical record nor as arbitrary fiction; rather, its historical material becomes a vehicle for ethical and political reflection. A comparative matrix and a conceptual diagram clarify how historical reference is transformed into literary significance. Findings are interpretive, not frequency-based, and do not claim to reconstruct unverified dialogue or archival facts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Literature and Language Studies
Published
2026-11-06
Primary Topic
Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

HISTORICAL TRUTH AND THE SEMANTICS OF THE LITERARY TEXT IN FITRAT’S DRAMA “ABULFAYZXON”

Komilova Baxtigul
International Journal of Literature and Language Studies
Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
article

HISTORICAL TRUTH AND THE SEMANTICS OF THE LITERARY TEXT IN FITRAT’S DRAMA “ABULFAYZXON”

Komilova Baxtigul
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between historical truth and literary-text semantics in Abdurauf Fitrat’s drama Abulfayzkhan. Using close reading, historical-contextual interpretation, narratological comparison and semantic analysis, it distinguishes the historical referent of the late Ashtarkhanid court from the meanings produced by dramatic dialogue, conflict and characterization. The analysis identifies three interrelated semantic axes: the crisis of legitimate rule, the moral consequences of coercive power, and the collective vulnerability produced by political fragmentation. The drama is treated neither as a transparent historical record nor as arbitrary fiction; rather, its historical material becomes a vehicle for ethical and political reflection. A comparative matrix and a conceptual diagram clarify how historical reference is transformed into literary significance. Findings are interpretive, not frequency-based, and do not claim to reconstruct unverified dialogue or archival facts.

International Journal of Literature and Language Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon