Carbon sequestration and avoided emissions reveal the net carbon benefit of urban green space in Beijing (2000–2024)

Urban green spaces (UGS) are widely promoted as nature-based solutions for climate mitigation, yet their carbon benefits are difficult to compare because ecosystem sequestration and demand-side emission reductions are often estimated separately under inconsistent accounting boundaries. We developed a spatially explicit carbon-budget framework to assess the metropolitan green-space system of Beijing from 2000 to 2024, integrating net ecosystem productivity (NEP), life-cycle carbon emissions, and cooling-induced avoided emissions. Under the baseline parameterization, linear interpolation between the 2010 and 2015 estimates suggested that NCB crossed zero around 2012, slightly earlier than net carbon sequestration (NCS) around 2013. This difference reflects the additional contribution of cooling-induced avoided emissions, which allowed the overall carbon budget to become positive before net sequestration alone did. The long-term transition was dominated by increasing ecosystem carbon uptake, with NEP increasing approximately sevenfold, whereas cooling-induced avoided emissions provided a smaller, spatially concentrated contribution, equivalent to about 5–6% of citywide NEP in recent years. The two components showed contrasting spatial patterns: ecological conservation areas contributed most of the NCS through extensive and productive vegetation, whereas central urban green spaces generated higher area-normalized avoided emissions because they overlapped more closely with areas of high population exposure and cooling demand. NCS was mainly associated with environmental and vegetation conditions, whereas avoided emissions were more strongly associated with population exposure and landscape configuration. These results support functionally differentiated green-space planning across the urban–rural gradient: maintaining extensive ecological capacity in peripheral areas while strategically locating urban green space where cooling demand and population exposure are concentrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105827
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Carbon sequestration and avoided emissions reveal the net carbon benefit of urban green space in Beijing (2000–2024)

Yingshuo Lyu, Xi Zheng, Shoubang Huang, Kai Zhou et al.
1 links
Landscape and Urban Planning
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Carbon sequestration and avoided emissions reveal the net carbon benefit of urban green space in Beijing (2000–2024)

Yingshuo Lyu, Xi Zheng, Shoubang Huang, Kai Zhou, Yuanfei Hao, Hao Yin
article en

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGS) are widely promoted as nature-based solutions for climate mitigation, yet their carbon benefits are difficult to compare because ecosystem sequestration and demand-side emission reductions are often estimated separately under inconsistent accounting boundaries. We developed a spatially explicit carbon-budget framework to assess the metropolitan green-space system of Beijing from 2000 to 2024, integrating net ecosystem productivity (NEP), life-cycle carbon emissions, and cooling-induced avoided emissions. Under the baseline parameterization, linear interpolation between the 2010 and 2015 estimates suggested that NCB crossed zero around 2012, slightly earlier than net carbon sequestration (NCS) around 2013. This difference reflects the additional contribution of cooling-induced avoided emissions, which allowed the overall carbon budget to become positive before net sequestration alone did. The long-term transition was dominated by increasing ecosystem carbon uptake, with NEP increasing approximately sevenfold, whereas cooling-induced avoided emissions provided a smaller, spatially concentrated contribution, equivalent to about 5–6% of citywide NEP in recent years. The two components showed contrasting spatial patterns: ecological conservation areas contributed most of the NCS through extensive and productive vegetation, whereas central urban green spaces generated higher area-normalized avoided emissions because they overlapped more closely with areas of high population exposure and cooling demand. NCS was mainly associated with environmental and vegetation conditions, whereas avoided emissions were more strongly associated with population exposure and landscape configuration. These results support functionally differentiated green-space planning across the urban–rural gradient: maintaining extensive ecological capacity in peripheral areas while strategically locating urban green space where cooling demand and population exposure are concentrated.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 279
Beijing Forestry University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon