Rethinking Police Firearm Accountability in Tanzania: Lessons from South Africa and Kenya

The use of firearms by law enforcement officers represents one of the most critical exercises of state authority because it directly affects fundamental rights, particularly the right to life, human dignity, and security of the person. Although police officers are legally authorised to use force in maintaining public order and protecting society, such authority must be exercised within the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and accountability. In Tanzania, police firearm use is regulated by the Constitution, the Police Force and Auxiliary Services Act, and Police General Orders. However, these legal provisions do not necessarily ensure effective accountability where investigations and disciplinary processes remain largely within internal police structures. This article examines lessons from South Africa and Kenya on police firearm accountability and their implications for strengthening accountability mechanisms in Tanzania. The study adopts a doctrinal legal research methodology supported by a comparative legal approach, analysing constitutions, legislation, judicial decisions, institutional frameworks, and scholarly literature. The study finds that Tanzania's legal framework provides a legal basis for regulating police firearm use but remains constrained by broad statutory discretion on the use of lethal force, reliance on internal disciplinary mechanisms, and the absence of an independent civilian police oversight institution. The experiences of South Africa and Kenya demonstrate that effective police firearm accountability requires clear legal standards on the use of force, independent investigation of firearm-related deaths and serious injuries, and effective institutional oversight. The study recommends reform of the Police Force and Auxiliary Services Act to clarify the legal standards governing lethal force, establishment of an independent police oversight mechanism and transforming the Tanzania Police Force into a service-oriented policing institution by drawing lessons from South Africa and Kenya.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East African Journal of Law and Ethics
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37284/eajle.9.4.6217
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Rethinking Police Firearm Accountability in Tanzania: Lessons from South Africa and Kenya

Kelvin Christian Kabaka
4 links
East African Journal of Law and Ethics
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Rethinking Police Firearm Accountability in Tanzania: Lessons from South Africa and Kenya

Kelvin Christian Kabaka
article en

Abstract

The use of firearms by law enforcement officers represents one of the most critical exercises of state authority because it directly affects fundamental rights, particularly the right to life, human dignity, and security of the person. Although police officers are legally authorised to use force in maintaining public order and protecting society, such authority must be exercised within the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and accountability. In Tanzania, police firearm use is regulated by the Constitution, the Police Force and Auxiliary Services Act, and Police General Orders. However, these legal provisions do not necessarily ensure effective accountability where investigations and disciplinary processes remain largely within internal police structures. This article examines lessons from South Africa and Kenya on police firearm accountability and their implications for strengthening accountability mechanisms in Tanzania. The study adopts a doctrinal legal research methodology supported by a comparative legal approach, analysing constitutions, legislation, judicial decisions, institutional frameworks, and scholarly literature. The study finds that Tanzania's legal framework provides a legal basis for regulating police firearm use but remains constrained by broad statutory discretion on the use of lethal force, reliance on internal disciplinary mechanisms, and the absence of an independent civilian police oversight institution. The experiences of South Africa and Kenya demonstrate that effective police firearm accountability requires clear legal standards on the use of force, independent investigation of firearm-related deaths and serious injuries, and effective institutional oversight. The study recommends reform of the Police Force and Auxiliary Services Act to clarify the legal standards governing lethal force, establishment of an independent police oversight mechanism and transforming the Tanzania Police Force into a service-oriented policing institution by drawing lessons from South Africa and Kenya.

East African Journal of Law and EthicsVol. 9(4)
St. Augustine University of Tanzania (TZ)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon