Created, Not Constructed

Transhumanism can promote the preservation and enhancement of life, but those aims cannot by themselves establish the unconditional worth of every human being. This article argues that a theistic account grounds human worth more adequately than the technological utopianism associated with Yuval Noah Harari because it locates dignity in the creature’s relation to God rather than in capacities, preferences, or social recognition. Read through the doctrine of the imago Dei, human dignity is given rather than achieved and therefore belongs equally to the powerful and the vulnerable, the enhanced and the unenhanced, the productive and the dependent. The argument does not reject technology or deny the moral seriousness of secular ethics. It distinguishes therapeutic care from projects of mastery and contends that Christian theological anthropology offers a more fruitful account of embodiment, finitude, transformation, and hope. Harari’s secular eschatology identifies genuine human longings but cannot secure the inviolability of lives that resist optimization. Christian hope, by contrast, judges technology by the good of persons whose worth precedes every technological intervention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Verba Vitae
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66100/vvj.v3i3.147
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Created, Not Constructed

Daniel Hackmann
Verba Vitae
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Created, Not Constructed

Daniel Hackmann
article en

Abstract

Transhumanism can promote the preservation and enhancement of life, but those aims cannot by themselves establish the unconditional worth of every human being. This article argues that a theistic account grounds human worth more adequately than the technological utopianism associated with Yuval Noah Harari because it locates dignity in the creature’s relation to God rather than in capacities, preferences, or social recognition. Read through the doctrine of the imago Dei, human dignity is given rather than achieved and therefore belongs equally to the powerful and the vulnerable, the enhanced and the unenhanced, the productive and the dependent. The argument does not reject technology or deny the moral seriousness of secular ethics. It distinguishes therapeutic care from projects of mastery and contends that Christian theological anthropology offers a more fruitful account of embodiment, finitude, transformation, and hope. Harari’s secular eschatology identifies genuine human longings but cannot secure the inviolability of lives that resist optimization. Christian hope, by contrast, judges technology by the good of persons whose worth precedes every technological intervention.

Verba VitaeVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon