Structural Modernisation of Public Administration in the Context of Post-Crisis Recovery

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the most crucial policies of structural modernisation in public administration during post-crisis recovery, especially in Ukraine. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study adopts a qualitative research design based on policy review and secondary data analysis to examine governance reforms and institutional change. The selected peer-reviewed articles and policy reports were subjected to thematic analysis, which included becoming familiar with the data, coding, developing themes, and interpretation. Research Limitation: The study is based on policy review and secondary data analysis, providing a basis for further research on the implementation and effectiveness of governance reforms in post-crisis environments. Findings: The results indicate that structural modernisation through institutional restructuring, decentralisation, digital management, and anti-corruption policy positively influences the efficiency, transparency, and resilience of public administration. In particular, digital transformation and local governance reform improve institutional adaptability and public service delivery. Practical Implication: The findings can support policymakers and stakeholders in designing and implementing public administration reforms during Ukraine’s recovery. Social Implication: Structural modernisation contributes to more resilient, transparent, and adaptive governance, supporting sustainable post-crisis recovery. Originality/Value: The study provides an integrated understanding of governance modernisation in post-crisis environments for Ukraine’s recovery and long-term public administration reform.