Prevalence and Coexistence of Multidomain Visual Findings in Primary-School Children in Madrid: A Single-School Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose To describe the prevalence and coexistence of visual findings across six domains in primary-school children and explore differences by sex and school grade.Methods This single-school cross-sectional study included 579 children aged 6–12 years in Madrid, Spain. Of 994 schoolchildren, 581 underwent examination (58.5% participation). Accommodation and ocular motility findings were classified using monocular accommodative facility and original Double-H scores, respectively; other categories used recorded clinical diagnoses. A stricter motility criterion (scores 0–1), selected post hoc, was compared with an expanded criterion (scores 0–2). Prevalence estimates, exact combinations, and exploratory associations were examined.Results Among 577 children with complete classification data, 240 (41.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 37.6–45.7%) had at least one finding, and 52 (9.0%) had concurrent findings. Reduced accommodative facility affected 19.4%, ocular motility findings 11.4%, refractive correction status 9.8%, and vergence findings 9.2%. Accommodative facility differed by school grade, while accommodation and refractive findings differed by sex after adjustment for multiple comparisons. No pairwise association remained statistically significant after adjustment. The expanded motility criterion increased overall prevalence to 54.1%.Conclusion Multidomain visual findings and their coexistence were observed, but estimates depended substantially on operational criteria. The single-school setting and 58.5% participation rate limit generalizability. These findings should not be interpreted as confirmed clinical disorders or treatment needs without further assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic Epidemiology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2026.2761006
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Prevalence and Coexistence of Multidomain Visual Findings in Primary-School Children in Madrid: A Single-School Cross-Sectional Study

Francisco Javier Povedano-Montero, Rut González-Jiménez, Juan E. Cedrún‐Sánchez, Ricardo Bernárdez-Vilaboa et al.
Ophthalmic Epidemiology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Prevalence and Coexistence of Multidomain Visual Findings in Primary-School Children in Madrid: A Single-School Cross-Sectional Study

Francisco Javier Povedano-Montero, Rut González-Jiménez, Juan E. Cedrún‐Sánchez, Ricardo Bernárdez-Vilaboa, David Blanco-Darriba
article en

Abstract

Purpose To describe the prevalence and coexistence of visual findings across six domains in primary-school children and explore differences by sex and school grade.Methods This single-school cross-sectional study included 579 children aged 6–12 years in Madrid, Spain. Of 994 schoolchildren, 581 underwent examination (58.5% participation). Accommodation and ocular motility findings were classified using monocular accommodative facility and original Double-H scores, respectively; other categories used recorded clinical diagnoses. A stricter motility criterion (scores 0–1), selected post hoc, was compared with an expanded criterion (scores 0–2). Prevalence estimates, exact combinations, and exploratory associations were examined.Results Among 577 children with complete classification data, 240 (41.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 37.6–45.7%) had at least one finding, and 52 (9.0%) had concurrent findings. Reduced accommodative facility affected 19.4%, ocular motility findings 11.4%, refractive correction status 9.8%, and vergence findings 9.2%. Accommodative facility differed by school grade, while accommodation and refractive findings differed by sex after adjustment for multiple comparisons. No pairwise association remained statistically significant after adjustment. The expanded motility criterion increased overall prevalence to 54.1%.Conclusion Multidomain visual findings and their coexistence were observed, but estimates depended substantially on operational criteria. The single-school setting and 58.5% participation rate limit generalizability. These findings should not be interpreted as confirmed clinical disorders or treatment needs without further assessment.

Ophthalmic Epidemiology
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon