AFI-RRT$$^*$$: Adaptive Free Interval Guided RRT$$^*$$ for Path Planning in Cluttered Environments

Path planning for mobile robots and unmanned aerial vehicles in complex environments remains challenging, particularly when efficient exploration, short path generation, and low computational cost are required. RRT \(^{*}\) and its variants can provide high-quality solutions, but they often suffer from excessive exploration and large search trees, especially in geometrically constrained environments. To address these limitations, this study proposes AFI-RRT \(^{*}\) , an Adaptive Free Interval guided RRT \(^{*}\) framework that combines coarse A \(^{*}\) -based global guidance with structured local free-space exploration. Its main advantages include focused sampling through adaptive free-interval layers, reduced unnecessary tree expansion, preservation of global exploration, and direct extraction of the final solution from the RRT \(^{*}\) tree without additional geometric post-processing. The proposed method was evaluated in nine environments over 30 independent runs and compared with Informed RRT \(^{*}\) , A \(^{*}\) , AdaRRT, RRT \(^{*}\) , RRT, RRT-Connect, and QS-RRT \(^{*}\) . AFI-RRT \(^{*}\) achieved the lowest overall mean path length while reducing average execution time by 13.8% and average search-tree size by 52.5% relative to RRT \(^{*}\) . Compared with Informed RRT \(^{*}\) , the corresponding reductions were 35.7% and 53.0%, respectively. The method also maintained a 100% success rate. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed statistically significant path-length differences against RRT \(^{*}\) in all nine environments and against Informed RRT \(^{*}\) in seven environments. Overall, AFI-RRT \(^{*}\) provides a favorable balance between path quality and computational efficiency by focusing the search on geometrically relevant free-space regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-026-01674-5
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

AFI-RRT$$^*$$: Adaptive Free Interval Guided RRT$$^*$$ for Path Planning in Cluttered Environments

Burak AĞGÜL, Amir Seyyedabbasi, Erdal Alimovski
3 links
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

AFI-RRT$$^*$$: Adaptive Free Interval Guided RRT$$^*$$ for Path Planning in Cluttered Environments

Burak AĞGÜL, Amir Seyyedabbasi, Erdal Alimovski
article en

Abstract

Path planning for mobile robots and unmanned aerial vehicles in complex environments remains challenging, particularly when efficient exploration, short path generation, and low computational cost are required. RRT \(^{*}\) and its variants can provide high-quality solutions, but they often suffer from excessive exploration and large search trees, especially in geometrically constrained environments. To address these limitations, this study proposes AFI-RRT \(^{*}\) , an Adaptive Free Interval guided RRT \(^{*}\) framework that combines coarse A \(^{*}\) -based global guidance with structured local free-space exploration. Its main advantages include focused sampling through adaptive free-interval layers, reduced unnecessary tree expansion, preservation of global exploration, and direct extraction of the final solution from the RRT \(^{*}\) tree without additional geometric post-processing. The proposed method was evaluated in nine environments over 30 independent runs and compared with Informed RRT \(^{*}\) , A \(^{*}\) , AdaRRT, RRT \(^{*}\) , RRT, RRT-Connect, and QS-RRT \(^{*}\) . AFI-RRT \(^{*}\) achieved the lowest overall mean path length while reducing average execution time by 13.8% and average search-tree size by 52.5% relative to RRT \(^{*}\) . Compared with Informed RRT \(^{*}\) , the corresponding reductions were 35.7% and 53.0%, respectively. The method also maintained a 100% success rate. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed statistically significant path-length differences against RRT \(^{*}\) in all nine environments and against Informed RRT \(^{*}\) in seven environments. Overall, AFI-RRT \(^{*}\) provides a favorable balance between path quality and computational efficiency by focusing the search on geometrically relevant free-space regions.

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul Topkapi University (TR), Istinye University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon