Distributed agency in an asymmetrical institutional gatekeeping interview

This article examines how agency emerges across interaction and documentation in the highly structured and power-differentiated institutional context of Belgian investigations into possible “sham” relationships. Drawing on a case study of one municipal interview and its corresponding official report, we analyze how an applicant’s attempts to answer questions, clarify details, and make her relationship intelligible are taken up, reformulated, or omitted as talk is transformed into bureaucratic text. Focusing on the applicant’s interactional flexibility, including narration and repair, the use of photographs, and laughter, we show that agency is not located solely in participants’ interactional behavior, nor fixed at the moment of talk. Rather, agency is constrained by the institutional context, with the civil servant retaining control over what becomes consequential in the report and forms part of broader administrative decision-making. The article thus shows how agency is unevenly distributed across interaction and documentation under conditions of asymmetrical institutional gatekeeping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Studies
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456261501322
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Distributed agency in an asymmetrical institutional gatekeeping interview

Mieke Vandenbroucke, Frank Brisard, Sara Bergen
Discourse Studies
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Distributed agency in an asymmetrical institutional gatekeeping interview

Mieke Vandenbroucke, Frank Brisard, Sara Bergen
article en

Abstract

This article examines how agency emerges across interaction and documentation in the highly structured and power-differentiated institutional context of Belgian investigations into possible “sham” relationships. Drawing on a case study of one municipal interview and its corresponding official report, we analyze how an applicant’s attempts to answer questions, clarify details, and make her relationship intelligible are taken up, reformulated, or omitted as talk is transformed into bureaucratic text. Focusing on the applicant’s interactional flexibility, including narration and repair, the use of photographs, and laughter, we show that agency is not located solely in participants’ interactional behavior, nor fixed at the moment of talk. Rather, agency is constrained by the institutional context, with the civil servant retaining control over what becomes consequential in the report and forms part of broader administrative decision-making. The article thus shows how agency is unevenly distributed across interaction and documentation under conditions of asymmetrical institutional gatekeeping.

Discourse Studies
University of Antwerp (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon