Is bat activity a reliable predictor of mortality at onshore wind turbines? Evidence from a standardized multi-site monitoring in Europe

Reducing bat mortality at wind turbines has become an urgent conservation priority. However, operators often fail to identify and avoid areas of high bat activity when planning wind facilities, despite recommendations from environmental authorities, and existing curtailment strategies still require optimization. Although acoustic monitoring has been suggested as a practical way of assessing collision risk, the relationship between bat activity and fatalities remains poorly understood and lacks scientific consensus. In this study, we analyze a unique long-term regulatory dataset from France, combining standardized nacelle-height acoustic monitoring and systematic carcass searches conducted at 51 onshore wind turbines over five years. We investigated whether ‘exposed’ bat activity, which is defined as acoustic activity recorded at nacelle height during turbine operation, could reliably predict bat fatalities while accounting for turbine characteristics. We also examined how this relationship varies among functional guilds and across biologically relevant seasons. We found a positive association between exposed activity and estimated fatalities. The relationship was stronger in late summer/early autumn than in spring/early summer. However, exposed activity contributed little to overall model performance. We suggest that the low explained variance reflects the substantial spatial and temporal heterogeneity of our dataset, as well as the limited resolution of mortality estimates. Improving mortality monitoring is therefore essential to better characterize activity–fatality relationships and enhance predictive capacity. While acoustic activity alone may be insufficient to predict bat fatalities across broad scales, it remains a valuable indicator for wind facility planning and an important tool for optimizing curtailment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.112182
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Is bat activity a reliable predictor of mortality at onshore wind turbines? Evidence from a standardized multi-site monitoring in Europe

Kévin Barré, Elise Sivault, Christian Kerbiriou, Andréas Ravache et al.
2 links
Biological Conservation
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
article

Is bat activity a reliable predictor of mortality at onshore wind turbines? Evidence from a standardized multi-site monitoring in Europe

Kévin Barré, Elise Sivault, Christian Kerbiriou, Andréas Ravache, Brice Normand, Nell Jousselin
article en

Abstract

Reducing bat mortality at wind turbines has become an urgent conservation priority. However, operators often fail to identify and avoid areas of high bat activity when planning wind facilities, despite recommendations from environmental authorities, and existing curtailment strategies still require optimization. Although acoustic monitoring has been suggested as a practical way of assessing collision risk, the relationship between bat activity and fatalities remains poorly understood and lacks scientific consensus. In this study, we analyze a unique long-term regulatory dataset from France, combining standardized nacelle-height acoustic monitoring and systematic carcass searches conducted at 51 onshore wind turbines over five years. We investigated whether ‘exposed’ bat activity, which is defined as acoustic activity recorded at nacelle height during turbine operation, could reliably predict bat fatalities while accounting for turbine characteristics. We also examined how this relationship varies among functional guilds and across biologically relevant seasons. We found a positive association between exposed activity and estimated fatalities. The relationship was stronger in late summer/early autumn than in spring/early summer. However, exposed activity contributed little to overall model performance. We suggest that the low explained variance reflects the substantial spatial and temporal heterogeneity of our dataset, as well as the limited resolution of mortality estimates. Improving mortality monitoring is therefore essential to better characterize activity–fatality relationships and enhance predictive capacity. While acoustic activity alone may be insufficient to predict bat fatalities across broad scales, it remains a valuable indicator for wind facility planning and an important tool for optimizing curtailment strategies.

Biological ConservationVol. 325
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Luxembourg (LU), Sorbonne Université (FR), Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (FR), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR)
Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon