The Effect of Simulations on Content Learning in Social Studies for Grade 11 Students

This paper presents a quantitative-qualitative research study as part of a dissertation concerning the effect of simulations on content learning in social studies for Grade 11 students. First names of students who asked to be mentioned in the paper and school names are pseudonyms. This study came about after 30 years of using simulations in social studies classes, but not having tested their effect on student learning.In testing such an effect, this research focused on the question: Do chaordic, scaffolded, and constructivist simulations affect content learning in social studies for Grade 11 students as measured by quantitative and qualitative instruments. The study does measure the effect of such simulations quantitatively and places data in the context of qualitative findings.To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experimental research approach was employed using a nonrandomized control group pretest and posttest design for the quantitative study. Control and test cohorts of pupils went through pretest and posttest phases during which data and findings were collected and analysed. This study did not show statistically significant differences between the control and test group posttest results. The null hypothesis is therefore accepted: Chaordic, scaffolded and constructivist simulations do not affect content learning in social studies for Grade 11 students.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/pqng9
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

The Effect of Simulations on Content Learning in Social Studies for Grade 11 Students

Stephen Mark Wilkin
EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
preprint

The Effect of Simulations on Content Learning in Social Studies for Grade 11 Students

Stephen Mark Wilkin
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative-qualitative research study as part of a dissertation concerning the effect of simulations on content learning in social studies for Grade 11 students. First names of students who asked to be mentioned in the paper and school names are pseudonyms. This study came about after 30 years of using simulations in social studies classes, but not having tested their effect on student learning.In testing such an effect, this research focused on the question: Do chaordic, scaffolded, and constructivist simulations affect content learning in social studies for Grade 11 students as measured by quantitative and qualitative instruments. The study does measure the effect of such simulations quantitatively and places data in the context of qualitative findings.To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experimental research approach was employed using a nonrandomized control group pretest and posttest design for the quantitative study. Control and test cohorts of pupils went through pretest and posttest phases during which data and findings were collected and analysed. This study did not show statistically significant differences between the control and test group posttest results. The null hypothesis is therefore accepted: Chaordic, scaffolded and constructivist simulations do not affect content learning in social studies for Grade 11 students.

EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Quality education
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon