Growth and Development Accounting Between 1990 and 2019: Theoretical Revisions, Methodological Clarifications, and Empirical Results

ABSTRACT Focusing on productivity measurement, this article contributes to the growth and development accounting literature by improving the accuracy of results within the existing framework—without introducing new variables. We implement three simultaneous revisions to the standard growth and development accounting frameworks: (i) accounting for labor quality, (ii) allowing for time‐ and country‐varying factor elasticities, and (iii) relaxing the assumption of constant unitary returns to scale. All affect the contributions to growth and development. Using data from PWT 10.0, we calibrate growth and development accounting frameworks to quantify and rank the drivers of growth and development across 130 countries from 1990 to 2019. Results and stylized facts are presented at the country level, by income group, and for the full sample. The three proposed refinements, pedagogically grounded in empirical evidence, provide more precise estimates of the contributions of capital, labor, labor quality, and aggregate productivity to economic growth and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Development Economics
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70228
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Growth and Development Accounting Between 1990 and 2019: Theoretical Revisions, Methodological Clarifications, and Empirical Results

Georges Daw
Review of Development Economics
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

Growth and Development Accounting Between 1990 and 2019: Theoretical Revisions, Methodological Clarifications, and Empirical Results

Georges Daw
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Focusing on productivity measurement, this article contributes to the growth and development accounting literature by improving the accuracy of results within the existing framework—without introducing new variables. We implement three simultaneous revisions to the standard growth and development accounting frameworks: (i) accounting for labor quality, (ii) allowing for time‐ and country‐varying factor elasticities, and (iii) relaxing the assumption of constant unitary returns to scale. All affect the contributions to growth and development. Using data from PWT 10.0, we calibrate growth and development accounting frameworks to quantify and rank the drivers of growth and development across 130 countries from 1990 to 2019. Results and stylized facts are presented at the country level, by income group, and for the full sample. The three proposed refinements, pedagogically grounded in empirical evidence, provide more precise estimates of the contributions of capital, labor, labor quality, and aggregate productivity to economic growth and development.

Review of Development Economics
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Université Paris 8 (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon