Formal Specification, Correctness Argument, and Complexity Analysis of Recursive SAT Decomposition

This manuscript presents a proposed recursive decomposition framework for Boolean satisfiability (SAT), together with a formal specification, correctness argument, and complexity analysis. The framework recursively partitions a Boolean satisfiability instance into smaller child instances, uses a finite base-case library, and combines child information through parent-level Boolean placeholders and shared-variable compatibility checks. The manuscript develops the intended SAT-completeness and UNSAT-soundness arguments, including the preservation of variable identity and joint compatibility across decomposition layers. It also provides an operation-count analysis and discusses the conditions required to establish a polynomial-time implementation. This work is submitted as a proposed mathematical argument for independent review. In particular, the decomposition equivalence, completeness of the compatibility procedure, and polynomial bit-complexity warrant rigorous examination. The manuscript does not claim that the P versus NP problem has been accepted as solved.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24029012
Primary Topic
Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Formal Specification, Correctness Argument, and Complexity Analysis of Recursive SAT Decomposition

Harshan Singh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
preprint

Formal Specification, Correctness Argument, and Complexity Analysis of Recursive SAT Decomposition

Harshan Singh
preprint en

Abstract

This manuscript presents a proposed recursive decomposition framework for Boolean satisfiability (SAT), together with a formal specification, correctness argument, and complexity analysis. The framework recursively partitions a Boolean satisfiability instance into smaller child instances, uses a finite base-case library, and combines child information through parent-level Boolean placeholders and shared-variable compatibility checks. The manuscript develops the intended SAT-completeness and UNSAT-soundness arguments, including the preservation of variable identity and joint compatibility across decomposition layers. It also provides an operation-count analysis and discusses the conditions required to establish a polynomial-time implementation. This work is submitted as a proposed mathematical argument for independent review. In particular, the decomposition equivalence, completeness of the compatibility procedure, and polynomial bit-complexity warrant rigorous examination. The manuscript does not claim that the P versus NP problem has been accepted as solved.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Formal Specification, Correctness Argument, and Complexity Analysis of Recursive SAT Decomposition — Harshan Singh · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS