The green gap between digital visibility and financial performance in sustainable consumer brands

Despite substantial growth in social media marketing (SMM) research, evidence of whether eco-brand digital visibility translates into financial performance remains absent from the literature. Most existing studies measure consumer attitudes and purchase intentions rather than observed market outcomes, leaving the green gap, the divergence between sustainability intentions and actual behavior, untested at the firm financial level. This study addresses that gap through an exploratory multiple-case analysis of four publicly listed, sustainability-positioned consumer brands (Allbirds, Beyond Meat, Oatly, and The Honest Company) observed monthly from January 2021 to December 2024, combining 48 months of Wikipedia pageview data as a digital public attention proxy with audited annual financial statements. Four analytical layers are applied: non-parametric trend analysis, correlational analysis, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, and Fuzzy Cognitive Map scenario simulation. Within this four-firm sample, the evidence supports H1, does not support H2, and yields inconclusive or preliminary results for H3 and H4; H5 is illustrated by simulation rather than tested. Aggregate eco-brand digital attention declined by 38.6% over the study period (slope = − 710 pageviews/month; Mann-Kendall with autocorrelation correction z = − 4.39, p < 0.001), consistent with novelty decay and the accumulation of greenwashing skepticism. Firm-specific attention-to-revenue ratios do not differ reliably by product category (39.8 versus 25.7 pageviews per USD million, p = 0.117), with overlap between categories, so the category-moderation hypothesis is not supported. No association between firm-specific attention and financial outcomes is detected in the full sample, though leave-one-firm-out re-estimation shows the result is sensitive to the exclusion of individual firms, so the decoupling pattern is reported as inconclusive rather than established. The preliminary fuzzy-set analysis points to margin improvement combined with product category as the strongest candidate configuration for revenue growth, though a configuration including high attention approaches the same threshold. FCM scenario simulation illustrates asymmetric system dynamics: attention losses produce disproportionately larger financial deterioration than equivalent attention gains produce improvement. These exploratory findings suggest avenues for sustainable-consumption research and anti-greenwashing policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-05272-5
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The green gap between digital visibility and financial performance in sustainable consumer brands

Dimitrios P. Reklitis, Vasiliki Kremastioti, Evangelos Siokas, Nikolaos Th. Giannakopoulos et al.
3 links
Discover Sustainability
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

The green gap between digital visibility and financial performance in sustainable consumer brands

Dimitrios P. Reklitis, Vasiliki Kremastioti, Evangelos Siokas, Nikolaos Th. Giannakopoulos, Δαμιανός Π. Σακάς, Marina C. Terzi
article en

Abstract

Despite substantial growth in social media marketing (SMM) research, evidence of whether eco-brand digital visibility translates into financial performance remains absent from the literature. Most existing studies measure consumer attitudes and purchase intentions rather than observed market outcomes, leaving the green gap, the divergence between sustainability intentions and actual behavior, untested at the firm financial level. This study addresses that gap through an exploratory multiple-case analysis of four publicly listed, sustainability-positioned consumer brands (Allbirds, Beyond Meat, Oatly, and The Honest Company) observed monthly from January 2021 to December 2024, combining 48 months of Wikipedia pageview data as a digital public attention proxy with audited annual financial statements. Four analytical layers are applied: non-parametric trend analysis, correlational analysis, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, and Fuzzy Cognitive Map scenario simulation. Within this four-firm sample, the evidence supports H1, does not support H2, and yields inconclusive or preliminary results for H3 and H4; H5 is illustrated by simulation rather than tested. Aggregate eco-brand digital attention declined by 38.6% over the study period (slope = − 710 pageviews/month; Mann-Kendall with autocorrelation correction z = − 4.39, p < 0.001), consistent with novelty decay and the accumulation of greenwashing skepticism. Firm-specific attention-to-revenue ratios do not differ reliably by product category (39.8 versus 25.7 pageviews per USD million, p = 0.117), with overlap between categories, so the category-moderation hypothesis is not supported. No association between firm-specific attention and financial outcomes is detected in the full sample, though leave-one-firm-out re-estimation shows the result is sensitive to the exclusion of individual firms, so the decoupling pattern is reported as inconclusive rather than established. The preliminary fuzzy-set analysis points to margin improvement combined with product category as the strongest candidate configuration for revenue growth, though a configuration including high attention approaches the same threshold. FCM scenario simulation illustrates asymmetric system dynamics: attention losses produce disproportionately larger financial deterioration than equivalent attention gains produce improvement. These exploratory findings suggest avenues for sustainable-consumption research and anti-greenwashing policy design.

Discover Sustainability
Agricultural University of Athens (GR), University of Peloponnese (GR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon