Minimal Audit Protocol for Published AI Reliability Figures in Deployed AI Systems (v0.2)

AI systems increasingly publish figures about their own quality: evaluation scores, confidence levels, validation rates, grounding ratios. Readers rarely have a way to check them. This document is a procedure for doing so. It sets out ten steps, from reading the target's documents to contacting its author before publication; thirteen checks with explicit pass and finding criteria, and four supporting techniques; a rule for classifying each finding as a measurement, omission or framing problem; and a fixed report format. An applicability table says which checks to run for a given system, so the protocol can be applied to an evaluation harness, a retrieval-augmented agent or a deployed product. The protocol was first written for, and applied in, a self-audit of a deployed biomedical AI system (Idiakhoa, 2026), and revised after a second audit of an open-source retrieval-augmented agent. Thresholds marked as v0.2 defaults have not yet been validated across systems. The protocol is published so that a third party can apply it without either case study

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24036827
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Minimal Audit Protocol for Published AI Reliability Figures in Deployed AI Systems (v0.2)

oluwafemi Idiakhoa
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Minimal Audit Protocol for Published AI Reliability Figures in Deployed AI Systems (v0.2)

oluwafemi Idiakhoa
preprint en

Abstract

AI systems increasingly publish figures about their own quality: evaluation scores, confidence levels, validation rates, grounding ratios. Readers rarely have a way to check them. This document is a procedure for doing so. It sets out ten steps, from reading the target's documents to contacting its author before publication; thirteen checks with explicit pass and finding criteria, and four supporting techniques; a rule for classifying each finding as a measurement, omission or framing problem; and a fixed report format. An applicability table says which checks to run for a given system, so the protocol can be applied to an evaluation harness, a retrieval-augmented agent or a deployed product. The protocol was first written for, and applied in, a self-audit of a deployed biomedical AI system (Idiakhoa, 2026), and revised after a second audit of an open-source retrieval-augmented agent. Thresholds marked as v0.2 defaults have not yet been validated across systems. The protocol is published so that a third party can apply it without either case study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon