Minimal Audit Protocol for Published AI Reliability Figures in Deployed AI Systems (v0.2)
AI systems increasingly publish figures about their own quality: evaluation scores, confidence levels, validation rates, grounding ratios. Readers rarely have a way to check them. This document is a procedure for doing so. It sets out ten steps, from reading the target's documents to contacting its author before publication; thirteen checks with explicit pass and finding criteria, and four supporting techniques; a rule for classifying each finding as a measurement, omission or framing problem; and a fixed report format. An applicability table says which checks to run for a given system, so the protocol can be applied to an evaluation harness, a retrieval-augmented agent or a deployed product. The protocol was first written for, and applied in, a self-audit of a deployed biomedical AI system (Idiakhoa, 2026), and revised after a second audit of an open-source retrieval-augmented agent. Thresholds marked as v0.2 defaults have not yet been validated across systems. The protocol is published so that a third party can apply it without either case study
Authors
- oluwafemi Idiakhoa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7911-1171)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-11-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24036827
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- preprint