A Simple Method to Quantify Bedrock Map Error

ABSTRACT Geologic maps are foundational to geology. However, most geologic map contacts lack quantitative estimates of uncertainty, typically displaying known contacts as a solid line and uncertain contacts as a dashed line. To address this gap, an easily applied method is presented that provides a quantitative measure of the location of a mapped contact. This was done by creating a raster of the contact between two bedrock units and another raster of the bedrock surface. The mapped contact is where these two rasters intersect, or where their difference is zero. The error distribution of each raster was determined by using training and testing data. This allowed calculation of the overall error distribution of the difference of the rasters and the probability of the presence or absence of the upper bedrock unit. The probability of encountering either unit can then be mapped, with the contact located at the 50% probability contour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Terra Nova
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.70065
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Simple Method to Quantify Bedrock Map Error

Eric D. Stewart, David Hart
Terra Nova
Geological Modeling and Analysis
article

A Simple Method to Quantify Bedrock Map Error

Eric D. Stewart, David Hart
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Geologic maps are foundational to geology. However, most geologic map contacts lack quantitative estimates of uncertainty, typically displaying known contacts as a solid line and uncertain contacts as a dashed line. To address this gap, an easily applied method is presented that provides a quantitative measure of the location of a mapped contact. This was done by creating a raster of the contact between two bedrock units and another raster of the bedrock surface. The mapped contact is where these two rasters intersect, or where their difference is zero. The error distribution of each raster was determined by using training and testing data. This allowed calculation of the overall error distribution of the difference of the rasters and the probability of the presence or absence of the upper bedrock unit. The probability of encountering either unit can then be mapped, with the contact located at the 50% probability contour.

Terra Nova
University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon