Prevalence and Natural Course of Radiographic C1-2 Osteoarthritis: A CT-based analysis of health-checkup participants

Abstract Purpose: Radiographic C1-2 osteoarthritis (OA) may be detected in populations not selected for neck symptoms, but longitudinal data are limited. We evaluated its prevalence, natural course, and associated factors.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 689 health-checkup participants with paired whole-body computed tomography examinations at least 5 years apart. C1-2 OA was graded from 0 to 3. Baseline OA was defined as grade 1 or higher, incident OA as progression from grade 0 to grade 1 or higher, and worsening as an increase of at least one grade among participants with baseline grade 1 or 2. Logistic regression was used to identify associated factors.Results: Baseline OA was present in 102 participants (14.8%). Incident OA occurred in 6 of 587 participants (1.0%), and worsening occurred in 22 of 96 participants (22.9%). Baseline OA was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.10), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11–3.53), a history of spine surgery (OR 15.52, 95% CI 3.19–75.61), and higher hemoglobin A1c (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.17–2.40). In an exploratory model, higher inorganic phosphorus was associated with worsening (OR 8.47, 95% CI 2.10–34.20).Conclusion: Radiographic C1-2 OA was present in 14.8% of participants and worsened in 22.9% of those with pre-existing grade 1 or 2 OA. Radiographic C1-2 OA should not be equated with symptomatic disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11226143/v1
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Prevalence and Natural Course of Radiographic C1-2 Osteoarthritis: A CT-based analysis of health-checkup participants

Takashi Sono, Ryusuke Nakamoto, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata et al.
Research Square
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
preprint

Prevalence and Natural Course of Radiographic C1-2 Osteoarthritis: A CT-based analysis of health-checkup participants

Takashi Sono, Ryusuke Nakamoto, Bungo Otsuki, Koichi Murata, Masahiro Yakami, Takayoshi Shimizu, Shuichi Matsuda, Ryohei Saito, Masaki Sakamoto, Takuma Nose
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Radiographic C1-2 osteoarthritis (OA) may be detected in populations not selected for neck symptoms, but longitudinal data are limited. We evaluated its prevalence, natural course, and associated factors.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 689 health-checkup participants with paired whole-body computed tomography examinations at least 5 years apart. C1-2 OA was graded from 0 to 3. Baseline OA was defined as grade 1 or higher, incident OA as progression from grade 0 to grade 1 or higher, and worsening as an increase of at least one grade among participants with baseline grade 1 or 2. Logistic regression was used to identify associated factors.Results: Baseline OA was present in 102 participants (14.8%). Incident OA occurred in 6 of 587 participants (1.0%), and worsening occurred in 22 of 96 participants (22.9%). Baseline OA was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.10), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11–3.53), a history of spine surgery (OR 15.52, 95% CI 3.19–75.61), and higher hemoglobin A1c (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.17–2.40). In an exploratory model, higher inorganic phosphorus was associated with worsening (OR 8.47, 95% CI 2.10–34.20).Conclusion: Radiographic C1-2 OA was present in 14.8% of participants and worsened in 22.9% of those with pre-existing grade 1 or 2 OA. Radiographic C1-2 OA should not be equated with symptomatic disease.

Research Square
Kyoto University (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon