Public Debt and Sustainable Development: Does Institutional Quality Matter? Evidence From Cross‐Country Panel Data

ABSTRACT The research examines the public debt‐institutional relationship and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for the period 2002–2023 for 141 countries. Countries are categorized by their institutional quality (low, medium, and high level). A dependent variable is used to represent complex development growth, namely the SDG index. Utilizing an institutional quality index consisting of 6 governance indicators, the moderating effects of institutional quality on the relationship between public debt and other indicators are assessed by including an interaction term between the two in the analysis. To address cross‐country heterogeneity and distributional effects, the estimators that are used to evaluate the robustness of the model are the Augmented Mean Group, Dynamic Common Correlated Effects, and Driscoll–Kraay estimators. Public debt negatively affects the SDG index in low‐governance countries, but facilitates progress in middle‐governance nations. In high‐governance countries, institutions do act as buffers to negative effects and boost efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71876
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Public Debt and Sustainable Development: Does Institutional Quality Matter? Evidence From Cross‐Country Panel Data

Alper Aslan, Usama Al‐mulali, Alina Raboshuk, Buket Altinoz Savranlar
Sustainable Development
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

Public Debt and Sustainable Development: Does Institutional Quality Matter? Evidence From Cross‐Country Panel Data

Alper Aslan, Usama Al‐mulali, Alina Raboshuk, Buket Altinoz Savranlar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The research examines the public debt‐institutional relationship and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for the period 2002–2023 for 141 countries. Countries are categorized by their institutional quality (low, medium, and high level). A dependent variable is used to represent complex development growth, namely the SDG index. Utilizing an institutional quality index consisting of 6 governance indicators, the moderating effects of institutional quality on the relationship between public debt and other indicators are assessed by including an interaction term between the two in the analysis. To address cross‐country heterogeneity and distributional effects, the estimators that are used to evaluate the robustness of the model are the Augmented Mean Group, Dynamic Common Correlated Effects, and Driscoll–Kraay estimators. Public debt negatively affects the SDG index in low‐governance countries, but facilitates progress in middle‐governance nations. In high‐governance countries, institutions do act as buffers to negative effects and boost efficiency.

Sustainable Development
İstanbul Nişantaşı Üniversitesi (TR), Sohar University (OM), Erciyes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon