Routine CBC-Derived Markers of Systemic Inflammation Are Associated With Growth of the Dilated Ascending Aorta During CT Surveillance

Background: Ascending aortic surveillance relies on diameter thresholds, yet most dissections occur below them. Inflammation drives aortic wall remodeling independent of diameter. Inflammation drives aortic wall remodeling independent of diameter. Inflammatory indices derived from routine blood counts, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) have been show to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but their association with ascending aortic growth is unclear. Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied adults with 2 computed tomography (CT) scans of the native ascending aorta 6 months apart at a single center (2000-2023), excluding those with aortitis or no complete blood count during follow-up. Markers were summarized as 95th percentile values per patient and per scan interval. Growth was defined as a 2-mm increase in mid-ascending aortic diameter. Patient-level logistic regression and interval-level generalized estimating equation models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, baseline diameter, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and heritable thoracic aortic disease. Among 3,262 patients, data were available in 1,882 for RDW, 1,471 for NLR, and 1,468 for SII; 192 (10.2%) met criteria for growth. Only RDW was independently associated with growth in the overall cohort (patient level: odds ratio [OR] 1.071, 95% CI 1.002-1.144, p=0.043; interval level: OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.012-1.141, p=0.019); NLR (p=0.080) and SII (p=0.164) were not. Among patients with guideline-defined ascending aortic dilation (40 mm), all three markers were associated with interval growth (RDW OR 1.14, NLR OR 1.05, SII OR 1.01 per 100 units; all p 0.014), whereas none were among aortas <40 mm; effect modification was significant for NLR (p=0.01). Conclusions: RDW was modestly associated with ascending aortic growth overall, and all three markers were associated with interval growth in patients with guideline-defined aortic dilation, suggesting that systemic inflammation may contribute to progression of aortic dilation. Prospective studies with more specific inflammatory markers are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367393
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Routine CBC-Derived Markers of Systemic Inflammation Are Associated With Growth of the Dilated Ascending Aorta During CT Surveillance

Carlos Alberto Figueroa, Yogesh Karnam, Marion A. Hofmann Bowman, Grace C. George et al.
medRxiv
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
preprint

Routine CBC-Derived Markers of Systemic Inflammation Are Associated With Growth of the Dilated Ascending Aorta During CT Surveillance

Carlos Alberto Figueroa, Yogesh Karnam, Marion A. Hofmann Bowman, Grace C. George, Greg Spahlinger, Nicholas S. Burris, Ivo Queiroz, Bruno Murad
preprint en

Abstract

Background: Ascending aortic surveillance relies on diameter thresholds, yet most dissections occur below them. Inflammation drives aortic wall remodeling independent of diameter. Inflammation drives aortic wall remodeling independent of diameter. Inflammatory indices derived from routine blood counts, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) have been show to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but their association with ascending aortic growth is unclear. Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied adults with 2 computed tomography (CT) scans of the native ascending aorta 6 months apart at a single center (2000-2023), excluding those with aortitis or no complete blood count during follow-up. Markers were summarized as 95th percentile values per patient and per scan interval. Growth was defined as a 2-mm increase in mid-ascending aortic diameter. Patient-level logistic regression and interval-level generalized estimating equation models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, baseline diameter, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and heritable thoracic aortic disease. Among 3,262 patients, data were available in 1,882 for RDW, 1,471 for NLR, and 1,468 for SII; 192 (10.2%) met criteria for growth. Only RDW was independently associated with growth in the overall cohort (patient level: odds ratio [OR] 1.071, 95% CI 1.002-1.144, p=0.043; interval level: OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.012-1.141, p=0.019); NLR (p=0.080) and SII (p=0.164) were not. Among patients with guideline-defined ascending aortic dilation (40 mm), all three markers were associated with interval growth (RDW OR 1.14, NLR OR 1.05, SII OR 1.01 per 100 units; all p 0.014), whereas none were among aortas <40 mm; effect modification was significant for NLR (p=0.01). Conclusions: RDW was modestly associated with ascending aortic growth overall, and all three markers were associated with interval growth in patients with guideline-defined aortic dilation, suggesting that systemic inflammation may contribute to progression of aortic dilation. Prospective studies with more specific inflammatory markers are needed.

medRxiv
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (BR), University of Michigan (US)
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon