Performance analysis, optimization and dynamic control of a PTC-driven recompression sCO2 brayton cycle

This study develops a thermo-economic model for a parabolic trough collector (PTC)-driven recompression supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) Brayton cycle equipped with printed-circuit heat exchangers (PCHEs). The model combines optical and thermal analysis of the PTC field, separate 40-segment calculations for the high- and low-temperature recuperators, multi-objective optimization, dynamic response analysis and constrained operating control. Under the reference condition, the system produces 576.27 kW of net power, with a Brayton cycle efficiency of 30.83%, a collector efficiency of 68.23% and a solar-to-power efficiency of 21.03%. The required heat-transfer areas of the two recuperators are 16.43 and 12.09 m 2 , with corresponding pressure drops of 102.34 and 101.87 kPa. The parametric analysis indicates that receiver temperature governs the balance between useful solar heat and thermal loss, whereas mass-flow allocation and recuperator performance control heat-capacity-rate matching and external heat demand. Increasing turbine-inlet temperature therefore improves the power cycle but does not continuously improve plant-level efficiency because radiative heat loss rises rapidly at high receiver temperatures. The net-power–investment Pareto formulation selects a 245.51 kW design with an investment of USD 3.82 million, while the composite thermal-economic formulation selects 539.56 kW, a system efficiency of 24.10%, an investment of USD 5.15 million and a levelized cost of electricity of 0.3192 USD/kWh. Component response times are calculated from thermal-capacitance and inventory balances rather than assigned as fixed constants. During a simultaneous 20% load reduction and 22% decrease in direct normal irradiance, the turbine-inlet temperature remains between 508.08 and 577.25 °C, while the maximum power tracking error reaches 96.46 kW after the collector reaches full focus. The residual power deficit arises from insufficient solar heat, indicating the operating range in which thermal storage or auxiliary heating is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2026.108700
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Performance analysis, optimization and dynamic control of a PTC-driven recompression sCO2 brayton cycle

Lingbao Wang, Xianbiao Bu, Xiang Gao, Jiadong Yuan et al.
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Performance analysis, optimization and dynamic control of a PTC-driven recompression sCO2 brayton cycle

Lingbao Wang, Xianbiao Bu, Xiang Gao, Jiadong Yuan, Zhi Gan, Yulie Gong, Huashan Li
article en

Abstract

This study develops a thermo-economic model for a parabolic trough collector (PTC)-driven recompression supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) Brayton cycle equipped with printed-circuit heat exchangers (PCHEs). The model combines optical and thermal analysis of the PTC field, separate 40-segment calculations for the high- and low-temperature recuperators, multi-objective optimization, dynamic response analysis and constrained operating control. Under the reference condition, the system produces 576.27 kW of net power, with a Brayton cycle efficiency of 30.83%, a collector efficiency of 68.23% and a solar-to-power efficiency of 21.03%. The required heat-transfer areas of the two recuperators are 16.43 and 12.09 m 2 , with corresponding pressure drops of 102.34 and 101.87 kPa. The parametric analysis indicates that receiver temperature governs the balance between useful solar heat and thermal loss, whereas mass-flow allocation and recuperator performance control heat-capacity-rate matching and external heat demand. Increasing turbine-inlet temperature therefore improves the power cycle but does not continuously improve plant-level efficiency because radiative heat loss rises rapidly at high receiver temperatures. The net-power–investment Pareto formulation selects a 245.51 kW design with an investment of USD 3.82 million, while the composite thermal-economic formulation selects 539.56 kW, a system efficiency of 24.10%, an investment of USD 5.15 million and a levelized cost of electricity of 0.3192 USD/kWh. Component response times are calculated from thermal-capacitance and inventory balances rather than assigned as fixed constants. During a simultaneous 20% load reduction and 22% decrease in direct normal irradiance, the turbine-inlet temperature remains between 508.08 and 577.25 °C, while the maximum power tracking error reaches 96.46 kW after the collector reaches full focus. The residual power deficit arises from insufficient solar heat, indicating the operating range in which thermal storage or auxiliary heating is required.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 88
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon