SELECTED ISSUES CONCERNING THE CONDITIONS FOR THE LAWFULNESS OF APPLYING A PREVENTIVE MEASURE

The article is devoted to the examination of selected fundamental issues concerning the conditions for the lawfulness of applying a preventive measure, with particular attention to certain problems related to the assessment of reasonable suspicion and the substantiation of the purposes of preventive measures. The paper argues that reasonable suspicion must be understood as a minimum, yet lawful and objective evidentiary threshold, which cannot be overcome through an obvious circumvention of the law, including by reference to materials whose use for proving the relevant charge is manifestly precluded. In this regard, the article also addresses the relevant positions developed by the Court of Cassation, considering them problematic and debatable from a scholarly perspective. The next important thesis of the article concerns the assessment of the purposes of preventive measures. The author demonstrates that the purposes of a preventive measure cannot be assessed in an abstract or mechanical manner. They must be substantiated by individualized facts and examined separately, since each risk has an independent legal content. It is emphasized that facts relied upon to substantiate one risk cannot automatically serve to confirm the existence of another risk. Addressing limitation periods, the paper advances the position that, as a rule, the expiry of the limitation period for bringing a person to criminal liability excludes an independent ground for applying detention, except in cases where the accused objects to the termination of prosecution and violates the conditions of an alternative preventive measure applied in respect of him. At the same time, it is argued that the approaching expiry of the limitation period, although it does not in itself preclude the application of a preventive measure, constitutes a significant counterbalancing factor in assessing the degree of risks and may lead to the need to choose a more lenient preventive measure, in light of the requirements of the principle of proportionality.