EMAIL-HF: Can Digital Strategies Shorten the Path from Scientific Evidence to Clinical Practice in Heart Failure?

A substantial gap persists between scientific evidence and clinical practice in heart failure (HF). Digital solutions have emerged as promising strategies to accelerate the implementation of evidence-based therapies. This mini-review examines the results of the EMAIL-HF study, a registry-based, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in Denmark that included patients aged 20 years or older with a diagnosis of HF irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, who were not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Participants were randomized to usual care or a digital strategy consisting of an e-mailed letter with information on SGLT2i, followed by contact with an HF specialist. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients redeeming a prescription for dapagliflozin or empagliflozin within 6 months of randomization and the secondary endpoint was a composite of time to first HF hospitalization or death from any cause. The digital strategy significantly increased SGLT2i initiation within 6 months, although no difference in HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality was observed during the 24-month follow-up. Whether these strategies can translate modest improvements in treatment uptake into sustained, scalable, and cost-effective gains across diverse healthcare systems remains uncertain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Failure Reviews
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-026-10691-7
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

EMAIL-HF: Can Digital Strategies Shorten the Path from Scientific Evidence to Clinical Practice in Heart Failure?

Mario Enrico Canonico, Patrícia O. Guimarães, Dike Bevis Ojji, Kaveh Hosseini et al.
6 links
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

EMAIL-HF: Can Digital Strategies Shorten the Path from Scientific Evidence to Clinical Practice in Heart Failure?

Mario Enrico Canonico, Patrícia O. Guimarães, Dike Bevis Ojji, Kaveh Hosseini, Eduardo Bello Martins, Yasuhiko Sakata, Mitja Lainščak, Savina Nodari, Luca Monzo, Jan Biegus, Kalliopi Keramida, Tamás Alexy, Francesca Musella, Caio A.M. Tavares, Monica T A Albuquerque, VAGNER MADRINI JUNIOR, Andrew Ambrosy
article en

Abstract

A substantial gap persists between scientific evidence and clinical practice in heart failure (HF). Digital solutions have emerged as promising strategies to accelerate the implementation of evidence-based therapies. This mini-review examines the results of the EMAIL-HF study, a registry-based, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in Denmark that included patients aged 20 years or older with a diagnosis of HF irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, who were not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Participants were randomized to usual care or a digital strategy consisting of an e-mailed letter with information on SGLT2i, followed by contact with an HF specialist. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients redeeming a prescription for dapagliflozin or empagliflozin within 6 months of randomization and the secondary endpoint was a composite of time to first HF hospitalization or death from any cause. The digital strategy significantly increased SGLT2i initiation within 6 months, although no difference in HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality was observed during the 24-month follow-up. Whether these strategies can translate modest improvements in treatment uptake into sustained, scalable, and cost-effective gains across diverse healthcare systems remains uncertain.

Heart Failure ReviewsVol. 31(1)
University of Minnesota (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), University of Ljubljana (SI), Inserm (FR), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), St Savas Hospital (GR), Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center (US), University of Abuja Teaching Hospital (NG), Défaillance Cardiovasculaire Aiguë et Chronique (FR), Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Brescia (IT), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon