Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Brief Health Chatbot Acceptability Scale (CAS): A Pilot Study

Background. Conversational agents (chatbots) are increasingly used to deliver health information to middle-aged and older adults, a population in which the determinants of technology acceptance are known to diverge from those of younger users. However, acceptability is inconsistently defined and typically measured with ad hoc, unvalidated instruments. The psychometrically sound chatbot measures that exist assess usability rather than acceptability or were validated in student samples. Objective. To develop and conduct an initial psychometric evaluation of a brief, 10-item health chatbot acceptance measure grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Methods. Twenty adults (mean age = 52.8 years, range 28-81; 85% aged 40 or older; 75% female) enrolled in a sleep-application pilot usability study completed the 10 candidate items, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and sleep measures (PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). We examined item performance, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), dimensionality (exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation), and convergent validity (correlations with the SUS). Results. A two-factor structure emerged and was invariant across rotation methods, resulting in an Information Quality factor and an Acceptance factor (interfactor r = .39). All items loaded ≥ .60 on their primary factor; mean communality was .83. Subscale reliabilities were high (Information Quality α = .96; Acceptance α = .94; full scale α = .93). Both subscales correlated with the SUS in the expected direction (r = .69 and r = .59), providing preliminary support for convergent validity. Conclusions. The measure shows a coherent and theory-consistent two-factor structure and shows preliminary evidence of reliability and convergent validity. Given the small pilot sample, these results must be viewed as provisional but identify the measure as a candidate for formal validation in a larger, independent sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367380
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Brief Health Chatbot Acceptability Scale (CAS): A Pilot Study

Joshua Caballero, Raymond L. Ownby, Kamilah B. Thomas-Purcell
medRxiv
Technology Use by Older Adults
preprint

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Brief Health Chatbot Acceptability Scale (CAS): A Pilot Study

Joshua Caballero, Raymond L. Ownby, Kamilah B. Thomas-Purcell
preprint en

Abstract

Background. Conversational agents (chatbots) are increasingly used to deliver health information to middle-aged and older adults, a population in which the determinants of technology acceptance are known to diverge from those of younger users. However, acceptability is inconsistently defined and typically measured with ad hoc, unvalidated instruments. The psychometrically sound chatbot measures that exist assess usability rather than acceptability or were validated in student samples. Objective. To develop and conduct an initial psychometric evaluation of a brief, 10-item health chatbot acceptance measure grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Methods. Twenty adults (mean age = 52.8 years, range 28-81; 85% aged 40 or older; 75% female) enrolled in a sleep-application pilot usability study completed the 10 candidate items, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and sleep measures (PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8a; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). We examined item performance, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), dimensionality (exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation), and convergent validity (correlations with the SUS). Results. A two-factor structure emerged and was invariant across rotation methods, resulting in an Information Quality factor and an Acceptance factor (interfactor r = .39). All items loaded ≥ .60 on their primary factor; mean communality was .83. Subscale reliabilities were high (Information Quality α = .96; Acceptance α = .94; full scale α = .93). Both subscales correlated with the SUS in the expected direction (r = .69 and r = .59), providing preliminary support for convergent validity. Conclusions. The measure shows a coherent and theory-consistent two-factor structure and shows preliminary evidence of reliability and convergent validity. Given the small pilot sample, these results must be viewed as provisional but identify the measure as a candidate for formal validation in a larger, independent sample.

medRxiv
University of Georgia (US), Nova Southeastern University (US)
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon